From: Samuraiii <samurai.no.dojo@gmail.com>
To: gentoo-user <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>
Subject: [gentoo-user] VPN vs LAN address hostname resolution
Date: Wed, 22 May 2013 18:36:43 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <519CF41B.5040108@gmail.com> (raw)
Hello,
I am trying to get hostname address resolution on my LAN and VPN with
one serious problem:
I have two "networks" eg. 10.1.1.0 and 10.2.2.0 which are representing
local address space for LAN (10.1.1.0/8) and VPN address space (10.2.2.0/8).
Every host has its own address "suffix" (eg. host foo has LAN address
10.1.1.3 and vpn address 10.2.2.3).
I would like to setup some sort resolution which would account for
availability of host on LAN:
If host foo is in same LAN and host bar the connection would be carried
through LAN interface with LAN address and NOT (as avahi is trying to
do) using VPN connection which is connecting through remote server and
is therefore *a lot* slower than LAN connection.
The LAN address is not available always but VPN is.
So my question is there something which would do this almost same as
avahi but would be capable of prioritizing interface/address?
Thank you for advice in advance
S
next reply other threads:[~2013-05-22 16:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-05-22 16:36 Samuraiii [this message]
2013-05-22 17:36 ` [gentoo-user] VPN vs LAN address hostname resolution Michael Orlitzky
2013-05-22 17:52 ` Michael Mol
2013-05-22 18:30 ` Samuraiii
2013-05-22 18:40 ` Michael Mol
2013-05-22 18:52 ` Michael Orlitzky
2013-05-22 19:35 ` Samuraiii
2013-05-22 19:44 ` Michael Orlitzky
2013-05-22 20:52 ` Alex
2013-05-22 22:32 ` William Kenworthy
2013-05-22 20:43 ` covici
2013-05-22 20:40 ` covici
2013-05-31 16:04 ` [gentoo-user] " Samuraiii
2013-05-31 16:32 ` Samuraiii
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=519CF41B.5040108@gmail.com \
--to=samurai.no.dojo@gmail.com \
--cc=gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox