* [gentoo-user] New firefox-bin-21.0: bug or feature?
@ 2013-05-16 14:32 walt
2013-05-17 5:48 ` Nilesh Govindrajan
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: walt @ 2013-05-16 14:32 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-user
Portage just updated firefox-bin to 21.0, and after that I had no
firefox plugins.
Finally I discovered that the new version apparently ignores the
traditional symlink /opt/firefox/plugins->/usr/lib64/nsbrowser/plugins
I worked around it by creating my own symlink ~/.mozilla/plugins->
and all the plugins are working again.
Maybe this will save some time for you. Dunno if this a bug or not.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-user] New firefox-bin-21.0: bug or feature?
2013-05-16 14:32 [gentoo-user] New firefox-bin-21.0: bug or feature? walt
@ 2013-05-17 5:48 ` Nilesh Govindrajan
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Nilesh Govindrajan @ 2013-05-17 5:48 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-user
On Thursday 16 May 2013 08:02:48 PM IST, walt wrote:
> Portage just updated firefox-bin to 21.0, and after that I had no
> firefox plugins.
>
> Finally I discovered that the new version apparently ignores the
> traditional symlink /opt/firefox/plugins->/usr/lib64/nsbrowser/plugins
>
> I worked around it by creating my own symlink ~/.mozilla/plugins->
> and all the plugins are working again.
>
> Maybe this will save some time for you. Dunno if this a bug or not.
>
>
I guess it's a bug / change by upstream which has gone unnoticed by
maintainer of the ebuild. File @ bgo.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2013-05-17 5:49 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2013-05-16 14:32 [gentoo-user] New firefox-bin-21.0: bug or feature? walt
2013-05-17 5:48 ` Nilesh Govindrajan
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox