From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E21DB1381F3 for ; Mon, 13 May 2013 11:43:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id BBDABE0AE3; Mon, 13 May 2013 11:43:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-yh0-f41.google.com (mail-yh0-f41.google.com [209.85.213.41]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 81D84E09A2 for ; Mon, 13 May 2013 11:43:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-yh0-f41.google.com with SMTP id i72so1514286yha.28 for ; Mon, 13 May 2013 04:43:30 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject :references:in-reply-to:x-enigmail-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=D8PPSHavAE52VReQEhmRjcipS9ZNebUYSIoWOOxlt1U=; b=CKanCDrr5Bzv5A7ZMjtL2yXv4WjxVmschLDXWitg2mjrPb0N2NrBSyQfzjIdo3ym/9 yn7WHVnwhTbJCXE9J4Mz2tTp8chtw1W8PeZK4zQP2Wy+++vkedvlOMbpPxXm7H+xsQlw 7aen00lxy9e1LKi1qQZGivskpIVvpI1zIyOPj3vuEquAN9Vs9v+sBO4kObVYLd04Usp3 y2g500SHbAKocHxfu0/skoYwP2o91Ibfd3MIc/IxYTBf71rI38Q2CCEK4PwfEu7hAr9T lvBJCVx5L8laZJiYEa/SPJo1nE9V71pp+QwQgJGM9wnsMn1Y3uPmOi6UycsyIAhGMQdC iZTQ== X-Received: by 10.236.103.201 with SMTP id f49mr15532071yhg.55.1368445410582; Mon, 13 May 2013 04:43:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.2.5] (adsl-98-95-132-239.jan.bellsouth.net. [98.95.132.239]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id v34sm20103462yhn.26.2013.05.13.04.43.29 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Mon, 13 May 2013 04:43:30 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <5190D1E0.6060601@gmail.com> Date: Mon, 13 May 2013 06:43:28 -0500 From: Dale User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:20.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/20.0 SeaMonkey/2.17.1 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Gcc compiling, is this normal? References: <519006A0.2080807@gmail.com> <51900954.9050002@gmail.com> <51900F4D.2060907@gmail.com> <51908ECA.4020101@gmail.com> <5190AACE.2090205@gmail.com> <5190C0B6.1030300@gmail.com> <5190CB80.8050801@gmail.com> <283b682f57dec88de456c11f5666ac6c.squirrel@www.antarean.org> In-Reply-To: <283b682f57dec88de456c11f5666ac6c.squirrel@www.antarean.org> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.5.1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: 032a60ef-0bf2-443f-b495-ff99ab642cfb X-Archives-Hash: 8cfec96246e5aa5453ec5befdf909171 J. Roeleveld wrote: > I try to keep the USE-flags out of make.conf as much as possible. > Some packages have "multislot" where I don't necessarily want it enabled. It turned into a USE flag nightmare so I used package.use. Sometimes it just don't work out since a few packages gets into a world class wrestling match. I usually try but don't sweat it. > > > Well, after waiting for it to finish, I get this now: > > root@fireball / # genlop -c > > Currently merging 4 out of 4 > > * sys-devel/gcc-4.4.7 > > current merge time: 6 minutes and 57 seconds. > ETA: 17 minutes and 2 seconds. > > Currently merging 4 out of 4 > > * sys-devel/gcc-4.4.7 > > current merge time: 6 minutes and 58 seconds. > ETA: 17 minutes and 1 second. > root@fireball / # > > So there it is compiling the same package version twice, again. Going > to kill it since it will sit there and compile for hours if I don't. I > also found out I am not the only one having issues doing a ctrl c to > stop emerge too. They need some Raid on that problem. > > Open to new ideas. > Just a quick question, are you certain it is doing both simultaneously? > It could also be a bug in genlop? > > I always generate the binary packages, which means I don't actually need > to keep older GCC-versions. I can always unpack the package using "tar" :) > > -- > Joost > > > I have it set to save a tarball here but I'd have to look up how to rescue myself if I did screw up. To answer your question, I decided to just let the stupid thing sit there and compile. After a while, I got this: root@fireball / # genlop -c Currently merging 4 out of 4 * sys-devel/gcc-4.4.7 current merge time: 25 minutes and 17 seconds. ETA: any time now. root@fireball / # So, one of the compiles finished. That is a improvement at least. I just checked again and it is finished with them all and I got this for the end of emerge: Total: 4 packages (1 upgrade, 3 reinstalls), Size of downloads: 24 kB Would you like to merge these packages? [Yes/No] y >>> Verifying ebuild manifests >>> Emerging (1 of 4) app-misc/tmux-1.8 >>> Emerging (2 of 4) sys-devel/gcc-4.6.3 >>> Installing (1 of 4) app-misc/tmux-1.8 >>> Installing (2 of 4) sys-devel/gcc-4.6.3 >>> Emerging (3 of 4) sys-devel/gcc-4.5.4 >>> Emerging (4 of 4) sys-devel/gcc-4.4.7 >>> Installing (4 of 4) sys-devel/gcc-4.4.7 >>> Installing (3 of 4) sys-devel/gcc-4.5.4 >>> Jobs: 4 of 4 complete Load avg: 7.6, 13.4, 14.7 >>> Auto-cleaning packages... >>> No outdated packages were found on your system. * Regenerating GNU info directory index... * Processed 7 info files. * After world updates, it is important to remove obsolete packages with * emerge --depclean. Refer to `man emerge` for more information. root@fireball / # I'm going to say this tho, it did not have time to compile the last gcc even tho I'm sure it did. Your mention of a genlop error may be right. I bet genlop is reporting the wrong version on one of them somehow. To add this in case I didn't mention it. One time before, gcc compiled for like 5 or 6 hours while I took a nap. I can compile LOo several times in that time frame. Gcc never takes more than 30 minutes or so, usually around 20 or so. I have a 4 core CPU running at I think 3.2Ghz and 16Gbs of ram with portages work directory on tmpfs. This is weird. May look into a genlop change, up to a unstable one or back to a older version. See if that helps. Got to figure out how to force a upgrade tho. ;-) Thanks. At least I seem to have a clean upgrade now. Dale :-) :-) -- I am only responsible for what I said ... Not for what you understood or how you interpreted my words!