From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 64E701381F3 for ; Mon, 13 May 2013 06:22:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 2CC76E09D9; Mon, 13 May 2013 06:22:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DF8B5E0936 for ; Mon, 13 May 2013 06:22:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [10.171.176.81] (85-76-45-22-nat.elisa-mobile.fi [85.76.45.22]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: ssuominen) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A910A33DF48 for ; Mon, 13 May 2013 06:22:13 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <5190865A.4050802@gentoo.org> Date: Mon, 13 May 2013 09:21:14 +0300 From: Samuli Suominen User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130407 Thunderbird/17.0.5 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] gettext missing symlink message References: <20130513015739.GA8625@waltdnes.org> <519085DB.1030406@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <519085DB.1030406@gentoo.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: 40e74919-7f63-47aa-b86a-102f3f26288e X-Archives-Hash: 1b16353e912eb237852aec2f47a18858 On 13/05/13 09:19, Samuli Suominen wrote: > On 13/05/13 04:57, Walter Dnes wrote: >> I ran into this today while installing Gentoo on my new machine. >> >> making executable: usr/lib64/preloadable_libintl.so >> .[33;01m * .[39;49;00mQA Notice: Missing soname symlink(s): >> .[33;01m * .[39;49;00m >> .[33;01m * .[39;49;00m usr/lib64/libgnuintl.so.8 -> >> preloadable_libintl.so >> .[33;01m * .[39;49;00m >> >> >> https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=374545 was opened in July of >> 2011 (YES!!!). I don't want to bug the developers. My questions are... >> >> 1) does it cause any problems? > > no > >> >> 2) is the appropriate workaround to... >> >> cd /usr/lib64 >> ln -s preloadable_libintl.so libgnuintl.so.8 >> > > no, don't do anything, portage does it for you > ignore the warning err, sorry confused this with another. this warning is really a bug in portage, the preloadable library doesn't need to be called as per SONAME due to the way it's used in apps