From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D4B6A1381F3 for ; Mon, 13 May 2013 06:20:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 7B6DCE0961; Mon, 13 May 2013 06:20:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2DF1CE0885 for ; Mon, 13 May 2013 06:20:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [10.171.176.81] (85-76-32-155-nat.elisa-mobile.fi [85.76.32.155]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: ssuominen) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id DDDAC33DF46 for ; Mon, 13 May 2013 06:20:09 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <519085DB.1030406@gentoo.org> Date: Mon, 13 May 2013 09:19:07 +0300 From: Samuli Suominen User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130407 Thunderbird/17.0.5 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] gettext missing symlink message References: <20130513015739.GA8625@waltdnes.org> In-Reply-To: <20130513015739.GA8625@waltdnes.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: 45c184db-0b74-4337-84ea-07e66c91102d X-Archives-Hash: 1c0037e8ba0838f8715d853649828018 On 13/05/13 04:57, Walter Dnes wrote: > I ran into this today while installing Gentoo on my new machine. > > making executable: usr/lib64/preloadable_libintl.so > .[33;01m * .[39;49;00mQA Notice: Missing soname symlink(s): > .[33;01m * .[39;49;00m > .[33;01m * .[39;49;00m usr/lib64/libgnuintl.so.8 -> preloadable_libintl.so > .[33;01m * .[39;49;00m > > > https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=374545 was opened in July of > 2011 (YES!!!). I don't want to bug the developers. My questions are... > > 1) does it cause any problems? no > > 2) is the appropriate workaround to... > > cd /usr/lib64 > ln -s preloadable_libintl.so libgnuintl.so.8 > no, don't do anything, portage does it for you ignore the warning