From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B4BF1381F3 for ; Sun, 12 May 2013 15:37:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 207ACE0A88; Sun, 12 May 2013 15:36:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-wg0-f42.google.com (mail-wg0-f42.google.com [74.125.82.42]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 813CEE0A7F for ; Sun, 12 May 2013 15:36:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-wg0-f42.google.com with SMTP id j13so2157170wgh.3 for ; Sun, 12 May 2013 08:36:54 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=o8/96lRyl+c7Mz9Y9aAul/Sw1ElR6/xjZ9JL2u9SR0g=; b=Bja5HWOoIdsZa9eInA8xIGT6dpWTsUloHwhYMZPtF2FzYkxE7R24qerIsGGNdCLnk2 D/VzGywwVpSSx8IISZEb7NOtYe40SnSpZEWF/cSWwDJ39F7brfQi/FBM3zv85bgo8E7E +QZqp8nd+aTOJR1vX6j4WdL8fdoEV6UehURqVzimNk6bfw5D9UTZzFJKkSDPtYHglnF9 JhlwVNf2ECGCkfNEP6qbhd3qwAjuhK0b3LKgXodn0Vb9dIpo4VFrMlJnZQzQp6au376+ pPguRXXz3pxXychueH2TcVwdWPtD0D7WMUYQyDssSLgnZHGbcyKI4DAVhcYNFDvdt5wm +OUg== X-Received: by 10.194.76.199 with SMTP id m7mr34976324wjw.43.1368373014202; Sun, 12 May 2013 08:36:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [172.20.0.41] (196-210-126-126.dynamic.isadsl.co.za. [196.210.126.126]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id bs20sm10056817wib.0.2013.05.12.08.36.51 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Sun, 12 May 2013 08:36:53 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <518FB703.1070608@gmail.com> Date: Sun, 12 May 2013 17:36:35 +0200 From: Alan McKinnon User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130413 Thunderbird/17.0.5 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] preserved-rebuild acting strangely References: <20003.1368341444@ccs.covici.com> <20130512110941.1e174cef@digimed.co.uk> <3210.1368358198@ccs.covici.com> In-Reply-To: <3210.1368358198@ccs.covici.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: cdbdc5e0-5bb6-4476-a7af-6897dabde711 X-Archives-Hash: 1bbc62ef4e051b5d5813d034a5be3b33 On 12/05/2013 13:29, covici@ccs.covici.com wrote: > Neil Bothwick wrote: > >> On Sun, 12 May 2013 02:50:44 -0400, covici@ccs.covici.com wrote: >> >>> Hi. I am using gentoo unstable and after this last update when I tried >>> to do emerge @preserved-rebuild I get the following: >> >> I didn't know Gentoo specifically made an unstable version, it's >> generally rock solid for me. > Buy unstable I meant ACCEPT_KEYWORDS="~x86 ~amd64" > > >> >>> These are the packages that would be merged, in order: >>> >>> Calculating dependencies .... done! >>> >>> emerge: there are no ebuilds to satisfy "net-libs/xulrunner:1.9". >>> (dependency required by "@preserved-rebuild" [argument]) >>> >>> I have xulrunner 2.0 installed, although it looks like nothing depends >>> on that package, so I am not sure what is going on. I looked at >>> /var/lib/portage/preserved-rebuild-registrybut can't find xulrunner >>> anywhere in that file. How can I proceed? >> >> emerge -cav xulrunner > I have no ebuilds for xulrunner at all in the tree. But I will try as > you suggest because there seems to be nothing dependent on it. > Well, that did something good, now its going right along. > > Thanks so much -- this is a great mailing list. xulrunner is no longer in the tree. What I would do is run ldd on everything in lib dirs and grep for xulrunner to find which ancient package wants it. Then rebuild that package. -- Alan McKinnon alan.mckinnon@gmail.com