From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E4D21381F3 for ; Tue, 30 Apr 2013 14:41:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 054B8E096B; Tue, 30 Apr 2013 14:41:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from homiemail-a48.g.dreamhost.com (caibbdcaaaaf.dreamhost.com [208.113.200.5]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF21BE0941 for ; Tue, 30 Apr 2013 14:41:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from homiemail-a48.g.dreamhost.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by homiemail-a48.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7DDAE4F8074 for ; Tue, 30 Apr 2013 07:41:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (unknown [159.63.145.2]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: tanstaafl@libertytrek.org) by homiemail-a48.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 483774F805B for ; Tue, 30 Apr 2013 07:41:04 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <517FD7EB.8040700@libertytrek.org> Date: Tue, 30 Apr 2013 10:40:43 -0400 From: Tanstaafl User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130328 Thunderbird/17.0.5 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] udev upgrade and baselayout 2.2 References: <20130429223502.GE26236@crowfix.com> <517EFF6B.9090609@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <517EFF6B.9090609@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: 9d525d5f-000f-4696-94e6-8f8edfc3544f X-Archives-Hash: edbf53f77d25f53666891417ecdd58f9 On 2013-04-29 7:16 PM, Dustin C. Hatch wrote: > On 4/29/2013 17:35, felix@crowfix.com wrote: >> Some give me pause: >> >> =sys-apps/baselayout-2.2 >> >> Is baselayout 2.2 necessary for upgrading udev, or just optional? >> Could I upgrade this without upgrading udev? > I can't comment on baselayout 2.2 yet, as I have been holding off on > updating it on my systems as well. Why? No news item about baselayout 2.2, so whats the big deal? Ooops... guess I'm forgetting the other times that some massively major change was implemented with little to no warning breaking many people's systems... ;) But seriously... is there any major change in baselayout 2.2 to be concerned about? any links for reading? Incidentally, I already updated my shiny new gentoo VM to 2.2 and openrc 0.11.8, rebooted, nary a hiccup...