From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D881E1381F3 for ; Thu, 25 Apr 2013 15:02:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 0EE7FE0A6E; Thu, 25 Apr 2013 15:02:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: from homiemail-a47.g.dreamhost.com (caibbdcaaaaf.dreamhost.com [208.113.200.5]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F871E0A04 for ; Thu, 25 Apr 2013 15:02:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: from homiemail-a47.g.dreamhost.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by homiemail-a47.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0CD95284058 for ; Thu, 25 Apr 2013 08:02:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (unknown [159.63.145.2]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: tanstaafl@libertytrek.org) by homiemail-a47.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B9304284072 for ; Thu, 25 Apr 2013 08:02:51 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <51794585.5080502@libertytrek.org> Date: Thu, 25 Apr 2013 11:02:29 -0400 From: Tanstaafl User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130328 Thunderbird/17.0.5 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Server system date synchronizaion References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: 765e73f6-9f8d-4132-9bc3-b76e68d83d14 X-Archives-Hash: 6913cb05e3f8a45bcf4ca2cd8ef01fd6 On 2013-04-25 10:33 AM, Nick Khamis wrote: > We are trying to sync our server's time with an accurate ntp > server, and was wondering which of the many solutions are > considered viable. I did see the > http://en.gentoo-wiki.com/wiki/Time_Synchronization. Are these virtualized? It makes a difference, and from everything I've read, you don't sync virtualized servers the same as bare metal servers. > Our services are quite time sensitive. Ummm... *all* servers are critically time-sensitive.