From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D1501381F3 for ; Sat, 6 Apr 2013 20:15:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 77D59E08C5; Sat, 6 Apr 2013 20:15:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-bk0-f49.google.com (mail-bk0-f49.google.com [209.85.214.49]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EC27CE08A6 for ; Sat, 6 Apr 2013 20:15:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-bk0-f49.google.com with SMTP id w12so2554802bku.22 for ; Sat, 06 Apr 2013 13:15:32 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=5WGUdI4EVuy1ZnrMF0GBI3C5ooOgztlYQ8iLmhVbaxs=; b=Kq6vMMEOZ24XIdFyBdbEwwWaTQ1DvIjni3q8POrRq3ESXcga7eEih5dz4Lxm8qy5Tp Xn1fqsBVJeoLoNVBHHe8F5NJn0rVyX/PKyj38Gz9n3QgHBa0OSDXV5+2YVp950lUidwP tUwG12v9ryyTz22OeVhZTMJOTW44JRv7ut8lXR4bCMLuzVVAXiF1EiREualKXJ2ry1gW fyoxdmJHpiZ0tGohGh0gEIK2bZlF0/72QJ73UjdPV5S7T9UhJMFumapaha1w32m+C8J0 fBcBCrrRK8UsOauB41JnNnjnMY26TX9MVn4fkMp8iV4NLkILaZHgtBYHNxD+qZHR+Iwl E9Pw== X-Received: by 10.205.107.2 with SMTP id dw2mr590156bkc.112.1365279332139; Sat, 06 Apr 2013 13:15:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.178.21] (p57A855E7.dip0.t-ipconnect.de. [87.168.85.231]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id gy3sm10214719bkc.16.2013.04.06.13.15.31 (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Sat, 06 Apr 2013 13:15:31 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <51608262.4040708@googlemail.com> Date: Sat, 06 Apr 2013 22:15:30 +0200 From: Volker Armin Hemmann User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130405 Thunderbird/17.0.5 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Eth0 interface not found - udev that little slut!!!!! References: <20130406155741.GA2729@acm.acm> <51607173.8030308@googlemail.com> <201304062033.54951.michaelkintzios@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <201304062033.54951.michaelkintzios@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: a825227f-2828-4c1f-a46b-31402d30c777 X-Archives-Hash: ae7d27a9dcf77b700558e593f88f4d9f Am 06.04.2013 21:33, schrieb Mick: > On Saturday 06 Apr 2013 20:03:15 Volker Armin Hemmann wrote: >> Am 06.04.2013 17:57, schrieb Alan Mackenzie: >>> Hi, Nick. >>> >>> On Sat, Apr 06, 2013 at 10:51:42AM -0400, Nick Khamis wrote: >>>> After updating our systems we lost network connectivity to the >>>> servers. When trying to start net.eth0 we got the following message: >>>> /ib64/rc/net/wpa_supplicant.sh: line 68: _is wireless command not found >>>> /etc/init.d/net.eth0: line 548: _exists command not found >>>> Errror: Interface eth0 does not exist >>>> Ensure that you have loaded the correct kernel modules for your hardware >>>> # lsmod >>>> module used by >>>> tg3 0 >>>> lbphy tg3 >>>> eth0 >>>> flags=4098 mtu 1500 >>>> .... >>>> interrupt=16 >>>> >>>> lo >>>> flags=73 mtu 16436 >>>> inet 127.0.0.1 BROADCAST 255.255.255.0 >>>> inet6 ::1 prefixlen 128 scopeid 0x10 >>>> >>>> Please excuse me, I am running back and forth from the servers and >>>> typing the error message here. Did our configuration get switched to >>>> IP6? These are our DB servers and why me!!! Why ME!!!!! >>> No, it's not just you, it's happened to pretty much everybody. udev-200 >>> now renames eth0, eth1, .... to something else, dependent upon >>> complicated rules. In my case eth0 has become p6p1, though many people >>> seem to have got longer names. >>> >>> Have a look in /sys/class/net and see if your new name is there. If so, >>> edit all your config files containing eth0, switching to the new name. >>> >>> Once you got that done and things work again, take a deep breath and have >>> a look at the most recent Gentoo news item ($ eselect news read) which >>> explains it all, more or less. Then decide whether the above is a long >>> term solution, and if not start reading docs about writing udev rules. >>> >>> Yes, it's a pain in the backside. But at least with Gentoo, you've a >>> good chance of fixing things like this quickly. >>> >>>> Your help is greatly appreciated, >>>> Nick >> in my case it is still eth0: >> ifconfig >> eth0: flags=4163 mtu 1500 >> inet 192.168.178.21 netmask 255.255.255.0 broadcast >> 192.168.178.255 >> inet6 fe80::1e6f:65ff:fe87:6f6a prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x20 >> ether 1c:6f:65:87:6f:6a txqueuelen 1000 (Ethernet) >> RX packets 4647305 bytes 6693078055 (6.2 GiB) >> RX errors 0 dropped 0 overruns 0 frame 0 >> TX packets 2943816 bytes 226871998 (216.3 MiB) >> TX errors 0 dropped 1 overruns 0 carrier 0 collisions 0 >> >> sys-fs/udev >> Available versions: (~)168-r2[1] [M]171-r10 197-r8^t{tbz2} >> (~)198-r6^t{tbz2} (~)199-r1^t{tbz2} 200^t{tbz2} **9999^t {acl >> action_modeswitch build debug doc edd extras +firmware-loader floppy >> gudev hwdb introspection keymap +kmod +openrc +rule_generator selinux >> static-libs test} >> Installed versions: 200^t{tbz2}(18:30:31 >> 29.03.2013)(firmware-loader gudev hwdb keymap kmod openrc -acl -doc >> -introspection -selinux -static-libs) >> >> I did keep net.eth0.... > Is your eth0 NIC a module (modprobed), or built in the kernel? r8169 41918 0 module