* [gentoo-user] abi_x86_32
@ 2013-03-28 6:59 Raffaele BELARDI
2013-03-28 18:39 ` Paul Hartman
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Raffaele BELARDI @ 2013-03-28 6:59 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
I recently switched from no- to multilib. In yesterday's emerge I got
tens of blockers due to conflict with emul-linux-x86-xlibs-20130224.
I solved as suggested in
http://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic-t-953900.html?sid=f7a643eca8ec01540164578f372c374f
and
http://bugs.gentoo.org/461608
that is by adding abi_x86_32 to USE and unmasking
"emul-linux-x86-xlibs-20130224-r1", but didn't really understand what I
was doing.
Can anybody shed some light on this USE flag and what's going on with
multilib?
thanks,
raffaele
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-user] abi_x86_32
2013-03-28 6:59 [gentoo-user] abi_x86_32 Raffaele BELARDI
@ 2013-03-28 18:39 ` Paul Hartman
2013-03-28 19:11 ` [gentoo-user] abi_x86_32 Nikos Chantziaras
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Paul Hartman @ 2013-03-28 18:39 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-user
On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 1:59 AM, Raffaele BELARDI
<raffaele.belardi@st.com> wrote:
> I recently switched from no- to multilib. In yesterday's emerge I got
> tens of blockers due to conflict with emul-linux-x86-xlibs-20130224.
> I solved as suggested in
>
> http://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic-t-953900.html?sid=f7a643eca8ec01540164578f372c374f
>
> and
>
> http://bugs.gentoo.org/461608
>
> that is by adding abi_x86_32 to USE and unmasking
> "emul-linux-x86-xlibs-20130224-r1", but didn't really understand what I
> was doing.
>
> Can anybody shed some light on this USE flag and what's going on with
> multilib?
Old binary emul-linux* multilib packages are being replaced by a true
compiled-from-source multilib solution. There are a few packages still
need to be updated but it mostly works already. I think it will allow
for more fine-grained dependencies as well for 32-bit apps on 64-bit
systems.
Like the forum post you linked says, instead of setting abi_x86_32 as
a USE flag, what you can do in your make.conf is set:
ABI_X86="64 32"
(if you want to build both 32bit and 64bit)
You may need to unmerge the emul-linux* packages manually then emerge
deep world and figure out if you have any packages that have not yet
been updated to the new way of doing things.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [gentoo-user] Re: abi_x86_32
2013-03-28 18:39 ` Paul Hartman
@ 2013-03-28 19:11 ` Nikos Chantziaras
2013-03-29 14:21 ` Raffaele BELARDI
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Nikos Chantziaras @ 2013-03-28 19:11 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-user
On 28/03/13 20:39, Paul Hartman wrote:
> Like the forum post you linked says, instead of setting abi_x86_32 as
> a USE flag, what you can do in your make.conf is set:
>
> ABI_X86="64 32"
>
> (if you want to build both 32bit and 64bit)
I think ABI_X86="32" is enough, since on AMD64 the "64" is always there
implicitly.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-user] Re: abi_x86_32
2013-03-28 19:11 ` [gentoo-user] abi_x86_32 Nikos Chantziaras
@ 2013-03-29 14:21 ` Raffaele BELARDI
2013-03-30 6:20 ` Nikos Chantziaras
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Raffaele BELARDI @ 2013-03-29 14:21 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
On 03/28/2013 08:11 PM, Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
> On 28/03/13 20:39, Paul Hartman wrote:
>> Like the forum post you linked says, instead of setting abi_x86_32 as
>> a USE flag, what you can do in your make.conf is set:
>>
>> ABI_X86="64 32"
>>
>> (if you want to build both 32bit and 64bit)
>
> I think ABI_X86="32" is enough, since on AMD64 the "64" is always there
> implicitly.
>
That was going to be my next question!
By the way, I found this:
$ cat /usr/portage/profiles/desc/abi_x86.desc
# Copyright 2013-2013 Gentoo Foundation.
# Distributed under the terms of the GNU General Public License v2
# $Header: /var/cvsroot/gentoo-x86/profiles/desc/abi_x86.desc,v 1.2
2013/02/27 23:22:19 mgorny Exp $
# This file contains descriptions of ABI_X86 USE_EXPAND flags.
# Keep it sorted. Please do not add anything without prior discussion
# on gentoo-dev.
32 - 32-bit (x86) libraries
64 - 64-bit (amd64) libraries
x32 - x32 ABI libraries
...and searching for USE_EXPAND in
http://devmanual.gentoo.org/general-concepts/use-flags/ shows that
USE="abi_x86_32" and ABI_X86="32" have the same meaning, which was my
other doubt.
thanks!
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [gentoo-user] Re: abi_x86_32
2013-03-29 14:21 ` Raffaele BELARDI
@ 2013-03-30 6:20 ` Nikos Chantziaras
0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Nikos Chantziaras @ 2013-03-30 6:20 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-user
On 29/03/13 16:21, Raffaele BELARDI wrote:
> By the way, I found this:
>
> $ cat /usr/portage/profiles/desc/abi_x86.desc
>[...]
> 32 - 32-bit (x86) libraries
> 64 - 64-bit (amd64) libraries
> x32 - x32 ABI libraries
>
> ...and searching for USE_EXPAND in
> http://devmanual.gentoo.org/general-concepts/use-flags/ shows that
> USE="abi_x86_32" and ABI_X86="32" have the same meaning, which was my
> other doubt.
It's just a way to provide a default but still be able to override it if
needed. Putting ABI_X86="32" in your make.conf will enable abi_x86_32
for all ebuilds, but you can disable it for individual ebuilds by using
-abi_x86_32 in package.use.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2013-03-30 6:21 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2013-03-28 6:59 [gentoo-user] abi_x86_32 Raffaele BELARDI
2013-03-28 18:39 ` Paul Hartman
2013-03-28 19:11 ` [gentoo-user] abi_x86_32 Nikos Chantziaras
2013-03-29 14:21 ` Raffaele BELARDI
2013-03-30 6:20 ` Nikos Chantziaras
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox