From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gentoo-user+bounces-145266-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>
Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80])
	by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9016D1389AE
	for <garchives@archives.gentoo.org>; Tue, 12 Feb 2013 00:05:10 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 5F72021C06C;
	Tue, 12 Feb 2013 00:05:02 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-ia0-f176.google.com (mail-ia0-f176.google.com [209.85.210.176])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C3E3121C057
	for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Tue, 12 Feb 2013 00:05:00 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-ia0-f176.google.com with SMTP id i18so6832099iac.7
        for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Mon, 11 Feb 2013 16:05:00 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
        h=x-received:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject
         :references:in-reply-to:x-enigmail-version:content-type
         :content-transfer-encoding;
        bh=G2zz7Uxaa51rAmvI61BVuVvc0At8wNMH/x06zsgZrtc=;
        b=Oa/P5V2RJ0/f+hGRCMqMrfJcTjPf7orazu6aFtgeMgq67jxEjkMJuiv2KWqJ/pSjV+
         pcl/OAXOIDYwjKRdbJiRJAYz+DmYTTYY74HauIiN7etsOFBupL2wDfDo6DuUwCg1f8Tx
         e241o+ui4fZdxOwGd5uSGcYHZGimUeUnLGydyL+BWXb59xEx3/TgC21mro55BubquuuH
         8UqUVjQOUevboqUOTihfo78nfj+1nhGQxXIWMRaUTaIS57Fj3slUlpMP7xthBhz2paZi
         h0pcskymC2h8k8ci0gebTnOScd0uXwLVpimTf00Fl6exhs6fHuFbwIri9OS/nggkHgmq
         NkFQ==
X-Received: by 10.42.18.138 with SMTP id x10mr20066421ica.22.1360627500076;
        Mon, 11 Feb 2013 16:05:00 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ?IPv6:2001:5c0:1000:a::873? ([2001:5c0:1000:a::873])
        by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id as6sm28458050igc.8.2013.02.11.16.04.58
        (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128);
        Mon, 11 Feb 2013 16:04:59 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <51198724.9050609@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2013 19:04:52 -0500
From: Michael Mol <mikemol@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130205 Thunderbird/17.0.2
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-user+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-user.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] {OT} LWP::UserAgent slows website
References: <CAN0CFw0Zcn5BtzHbOVELrN+ihJ1B93+=Cr+YAfkSXJrSsuD__g@mail.gmail.com> <5113DA25.7060408@gmail.com> <CAN0CFw1bfy8huhECBFyn3H_XpOfJGPZ-BjPpXo5mGLaC_5ihHQ@mail.gmail.com> <CA+czFiCe1u=b9m+bt95Bdo9WAi6EULqBG1GqCRsZs62nWVon4w@mail.gmail.com> <CAN0CFw3hx7huykjkkujppjBcY=ZMhnYg=Sd1iM=gvvX3BxmoYg@mail.gmail.com> <5115BB67.9010307@gmail.com> <CAN0CFw25qnTpJ+6ZHMCErT1wdAU4GeNnaXg+=UwoZPj9MxWGcQ@mail.gmail.com> <51192DC5.6040802@gmail.com> <347F2023-2061-4A58-9965-F676632CDD6F@stellar.eclipse.co.uk>
In-Reply-To: <347F2023-2061-4A58-9965-F676632CDD6F@stellar.eclipse.co.uk>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.5
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Archives-Salt: 256654f0-b527-4dcf-80c6-1a1c60803680
X-Archives-Hash: 2fdf6187ee8588813b58e6392f15e612

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 02/11/2013 06:07 PM, Stroller wrote:
> 
> On 11 February 2013, at 17:43, Michael Mol wrote:
>> ...
>>> If so, I don't understand why apache2 seems to bog down a bit
>>> for about 10 minutes afterward.
>> 
>> Now that's a new (and important!) piece of information. Your 
>> server runs slow for 10 *minutes* after your script has made its 
>> request?
> 
> This information is not new - it was in Grant's first post in this 
> thread, hence the reason I wondered if you'd read it.

*goes back in the thread*

Indeed it is, and I missed it. Whoops. I assembled my understanding of
the problem from subsequent posts, rather than the initial one.

> 
> I am sorry if I have caused you offence on any other occasion - if 
> so, please feel free to explain why.

Primarily, what bothers me is your typically acerbic tone, and that
your posts often (at least to my perception) carry more pejorative
than useful information. I greatly appreciate your more conciliatory
tone here!
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/

iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJRGYckAAoJED5TcEBdxYwQ4u0IAKniOy6z8N890fi0YJPE96af
BOTI8jMZ/C2Qdgbg67vHb1yXR7LW+7RYk889PKLDkd3KYIG3KP2Zf1AN9bugjxEv
hiNHLLUSQhdjbuoDw1EVQCt8r1m7XbQdSRTAlVGWTf7H+MlPGR06JJRtQxCxOuIY
QChGpqeQEClR84D8Ml+bg3gkybYAratm2AY+mKv2GbVXydEu6guCN/1uje73F1dJ
fQO6/zQr285YrRYWGrRDM4xMosqEgubL0QDMJYHOaPtvvUE5M4wulelx41jYrD0D
wtGDxq0X01qDRRYWzs5tyDGgICYSp/YvxYs6SOCx6Asd4e0UwOW00RELkMB3bMA=
=40Yp
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----