From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E58E41389A3 for ; Mon, 11 Feb 2013 17:36:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B0E7421C03C; Mon, 11 Feb 2013 17:36:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-gg0-f175.google.com (mail-gg0-f175.google.com [209.85.161.175]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 32333E05D7 for ; Mon, 11 Feb 2013 17:36:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-gg0-f175.google.com with SMTP id l1so712827ggn.34 for ; Mon, 11 Feb 2013 09:36:33 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject :references:in-reply-to:x-enigmail-version:content-type; bh=C4gkMc1+yMwxenWFZLlFsrc3gHXNZpaJeGPynlQqio8=; b=FHLLHOeDqCPmmzu+lH+lypfIiEoe5I0YIePpzPApKOWNLzhNd1imJ1VdZWmPhpJU1U trRoXK/hUT+bJqJqNIdVb6GzmWwX7pSfOcgjWKPrYiRcCrNZ9IIq1LAKUEi7RDt/ZgDz izGk/RLKzgq0t/5f8D/De3sZ1owBuuCD9KR9qfJUnGgq52XUM/v/w2x2p0Aq8XID3p9+ sDQ81phcnRYSGw9kKXm3DY0doDk0jxfYdyzl3+WULsawOtkEACjOZ/HIkhGRQZLCuQGF oCdm0f42Nvn5RdjJ0DdyZt0nceFbzL266oc6Jzf9hGLPSQcrGlkeuRU9+gzQwjPkvG6L Ylbg== X-Received: by 10.236.156.197 with SMTP id m45mr18802059yhk.60.1360604193108; Mon, 11 Feb 2013 09:36:33 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.2.5] (adsl-74-240-57-140.jan.bellsouth.net. [74.240.57.140]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id f16sm37030724ann.9.2013.02.11.09.36.31 (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Mon, 11 Feb 2013 09:36:32 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <51192C1E.2060106@gmail.com> Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2013 11:36:30 -0600 From: Dale User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:18.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/18.0 SeaMonkey/2.15.2 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] udev-191 bit me. Insufficient ptys References:

<51191074.5030801@xunil.at> <201302111622.36229.michaelkintzios@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <201302111622.36229.michaelkintzios@gmail.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.5 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------000206070205000009030504" X-Archives-Salt: 8714d60e-a82c-44ce-9948-dfc9f84d3509 X-Archives-Hash: c90edfec248be4da7135054d360ec8d2 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------000206070205000009030504 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mick wrote: > I would think so. This is the only line that I have in mine and the system boots fine: # glibc 2.2 and above expects tmpfs to be mounted at /dev/shm for # POSIX shared memory (shm_open, shm_unlink). # (tmpfs is a dynamically expandable/shrinkable ramdisk, and will # use almost no memory if not populated with files) tmpfs /dev/shm tmpfs nodev,nosuid,noexec 0 0 +1 Dale :-) :-) -- I am only responsible for what I said ... Not for what you understood or how you interpreted my words! --------------000206070205000009030504 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Mick wrote:
> I would think so. This is the only line that I have in mine and the system boots fine: # glibc 2.2 and above expects tmpfs to be mounted at /dev/shm for # POSIX shared memory (shm_open, shm_unlink). # (tmpfs is a dynamically expandable/shrinkable ramdisk, and will # use almost no memory if not populated with files) tmpfs /dev/shm tmpfs nodev,nosuid,noexec 0 0

+1

Dale

:-) :-)

--
I am only responsible for what I said ... Not for what you understood or how you interpreted my words!

--------------000206070205000009030504--