From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gentoo-user+bounces-145016-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>
Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80])
	by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5BDC3138830
	for <garchives@archives.gentoo.org>; Sun,  3 Feb 2013 19:10:08 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 91A2421C0B0;
	Sun,  3 Feb 2013 19:09:59 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-ye0-f180.google.com (mail-ye0-f180.google.com [209.85.213.180])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E789821C075
	for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Sun,  3 Feb 2013 19:09:57 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-ye0-f180.google.com with SMTP id r14so1358084yen.25
        for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Sun, 03 Feb 2013 11:09:57 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
        h=x-received:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject
         :references:in-reply-to:x-enigmail-version:content-type
         :content-transfer-encoding;
        bh=NBRn9IbjGN1bUQORcQGMuQT1fikPtTpNELR/deW91SE=;
        b=Kw6Dx7RQzJMiGaY4+1w9OByuesVG4IrKLrf6og1Gej+CQ32OV9KtJLEiFoR3+o2rcm
         DhM1W16xx/LnnnWiS7wpGi6imHh7pq4fZgXpeGjpBf+ZGKjZyeIN8vZ3OTg7VAotNeC7
         LX2GF7wR5yJII6Rq2BZa9u4uMAF2qHdVtiM+5f5P38V7HdtX79Zg/kX1LVt9UypRReKz
         ZyBOnv+aMYx4ArR5ROtHEodfeoHNAyg28RHEqyO+JCVDd9wLZ1s/6yAll4sZXQglUX4f
         H9adfxukk4GV9zvAax1NqoWgYM52jDcL9vtRm01nJcepivyJjS02qB5gcqsNzqkauglK
         Zrmg==
X-Received: by 10.236.89.7 with SMTP id b7mr23073789yhf.123.1359918597029;
        Sun, 03 Feb 2013 11:09:57 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.2.5] (adsl-74-240-57-140.jan.bellsouth.net. [74.240.57.140])
        by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id x8sm15063983yhn.12.2013.02.03.11.09.55
        (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128);
        Sun, 03 Feb 2013 11:09:56 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <510EB602.4000805@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 03 Feb 2013 13:09:54 -0600
From: Dale <rdalek1967@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:18.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/18.0 SeaMonkey/2.15.1
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-user+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-user.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Confusing emerge output
References: <510EB1B9.3090607@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <510EB1B9.3090607@gmail.com>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.5
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Archives-Salt: faa5359f-db77-4364-8bfb-b2838c761b09
X-Archives-Hash: 372f2a6dbd7da6aaace1a2a1777d5c02

Alan McKinnon wrote:
> emerge -e --keep-going @world
> shows output like this when a build fails:
>
>  * One or more packages are either masked or have missing dependencies:
>  *
>  *   >=dev-libs/icu-49:0/50= pulled in by:
>  *     (x11-libs/qt-core-4.8.4-r1::gentoo, installed)
>
> I can't parse that. What kind of SLOT is "0/50=" ?
>
> So far this has happened twice. The packages that failed prior are not
> important,
> what is important is that when the depgraph is *recalculated*, I get
> that error.
> It's always that specific atom for icu causing issues and it's always
> pulled in
> by qt-<something>
>
> Anyone know what that atom means and if it's a bug or not?
>
> This system is ~amd64 and portage is latest masked 2.2.0_alpha161.
> Active python is 2.7
>


LOL  I'll give this a go, sort of.  I get this for icu:

root@fireball / # equery l -p icu
 * Searching for icu ...
[IP-] [  ] dev-libs/icu-49.1.2:0
[-P-] [ ~] dev-libs/icu-50.1-r1:0/50.1
[-P-] [ ~] dev-libs/icu-50.1-r2:0/50.1
[-P-] [ ~] dev-libs/icu-50.1.1:0/50.1.1
root@fireball / #

So, does it maybe want icu-50.* instead of the 49 that is installed? 
That would be equal to or greater than what you likely have.  I might
add, the 50 and above are keyworded. 

I took a stab at it but not sure what I hit.  ;-)

Dale

:-)  :-) 

-- 
I am only responsible for what I said ... Not for what you understood or how you interpreted my words!