From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DCF1E13868D for ; Fri, 25 Jan 2013 21:08:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E2F2321C049; Fri, 25 Jan 2013 21:08:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: from out5-smtp.messagingengine.com (out5-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.29]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 21DE0E01C9 for ; Fri, 25 Jan 2013 21:08:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: from compute5.internal (compute5.nyi.mail.srv.osa [10.202.2.45]) by gateway1.nyi.mail.srv.osa (Postfix) with ESMTP id 92CAA2090B for ; Fri, 25 Jan 2013 16:08:16 -0500 (EST) Received: from frontend2.nyi.mail.srv.osa ([10.202.2.161]) by compute5.internal (MEProxy); Fri, 25 Jan 2013 16:08:16 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=binarywings.net; h=message-id:date:from:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type; s=mesmtp; bh=5BWGvJQNsUnGiO6WkbSSibcZ +xI=; b=Vdm/efWglZ3DcaO3vzBfzvhF1970t1XdZ5kRk16sr8DNoGUNyywhr9c9 ed+4W6r11A7+9KridZqgeJtXfRvIoITlL66+2IG0/ikKelw08ahhKNCSlhAP2d5F 0Nq3yz0aDpdN3gTUrhGl6wFSTTHuxKXe0XAePhn3R0AH08u8z9o= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=message-id:date:from:mime-version:to :subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type; s=smtpout; bh=5BWG vJQNsUnGiO6WkbSSibcZ+xI=; b=fAf5w4zJtDFYN9WrmjKx2VsI451fwD7x1RmR AypdQlghQyqwoMpQ3hubu9aDRV3B8BX1VkmCngP3Nnetmy1NFF75W+J7J8f3IG4k YiPnidMk02GcZPuAXVS53pjZQFFOZHugyPApYYnH51ZlrVDbYHbqh/qHt8vB8OgA KUHVZs4= X-Sasl-enc: BKoRaccTMYhOVtBRsjGob5c1NKFcoRaOeP2o3a5hE9HG 1359148095 Received: from [192.168.5.18] (unknown [83.169.5.6]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 74FFB4827A9 for ; Fri, 25 Jan 2013 16:08:15 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <5102F438.7020000@binarywings.net> Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2013 22:08:08 +0100 From: Florian Philipp User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:10.0.11) Gecko/20121130 Thunderbird/10.0.11 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Boost version problem References: <20130124170559.3fc6e690@khamul.example.com> <5101883F.5050909@binarywings.net> In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 1.3.5 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enig98DFFEAC514C3A2FAF15CDE9" X-Archives-Salt: 067b71ac-3b3e-4988-9bf0-2203b90a035c X-Archives-Hash: ed71cabb0f72269e87e0fe9d7b674b76 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig98DFFEAC514C3A2FAF15CDE9 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Am 25.01.2013 20:02, schrieb Nikos Chantziaras: > On 24/01/13 21:15, Florian Philipp wrote: >> Am 24.01.2013 18:57, schrieb Jacques Montier: >>> 2013/1/24 microcai >> > >> [...] >>> >>>> >>> >>>> Libreoffice-4.0 needs boost > 1.49 (so works with >>> boost-1.52.0-r5) and >>> >>>> Nightshade LSS (for planetarium but not in portage) needs >>> boost >>> < 1.5 >>> >>>> (so works with 1.49.0-r2). >>> >>>> Is it possible to install both 1.49 and 1.52 (in new slot) = ? >>> >>> update Nightshade to work with boost 1.52 is the only way to go.= >> [...] >>> I already tried that, but Nightshade doesn't compile with >>> boost-1.52... :-(( >>> >> >> I could rant about the stupidity that is boost and/or packages that >> depend on it for some time but Flameeyes does a far better job at that= =2E >=20 > I wonder what the view on bundled boost headers is with Gentoo devs. I'= m > currently working on a project where I need boost, and now I'm thinking= > about using BCP (http://www.boost.org/doc/libs/1_52_0/tools/bcp) to > bundle what I need within the project. At least this would guarantee > that the package wouldn't be affected by this issue. >=20 >=20 As I understand it, bundling the headers is exactly what you are supposed to do with boost. Regards, Florian Philipp --------------enig98DFFEAC514C3A2FAF15CDE9 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAlEC9D0ACgkQqs4uOUlOuU9OpwCeP6KknhwH3r6zTpdldZ38JihL yHgAn1KZWbt40BAAGGTz31c8TfwxX6B1 =nWJS -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig98DFFEAC514C3A2FAF15CDE9--