From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gentoo-user+bounces-144495-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>
Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80])
by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A5D3A1384D1
for <garchives@archives.gentoo.org>; Wed, 16 Jan 2013 05:33:17 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 70EC621C0F0;
Wed, 16 Jan 2013 05:33:04 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-pa0-f53.google.com (mail-pa0-f53.google.com [209.85.220.53])
(using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B68A721C064
for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Wed, 16 Jan 2013 05:33:02 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-pa0-f53.google.com with SMTP id hz1so574715pad.26
for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Tue, 15 Jan 2013 21:33:01 -0800 (PST)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=google.com; s=20120113;
h=x-received:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject
:references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding
:x-gm-message-state;
bh=CmhV3Z+TD72SqMdYUE+YZY7SqSEDBy+vhvV6gVpXOrA=;
b=ea+1CDyjECXbASIvD1rJBQXD8HjS/8/r++gE9LgxyPiOsova+UKYNt+FhWe4kL3Zru
WT17FWalMU131t2zZ2FQTpCP/5pPIEeFlFQMsGP2JyOoCOamreRDGDnT9UWhb6YjXWg8
u3FML2+VPSoEcUocj1HbURaImQXGoTWVIDhfm0NKCMsQV3raEBvt/D0N7GLpQWNy01CI
0WWWurcSQB5l9WhJwVqkQJOq6JIQqqwLZ/vXqLCq5FdsmSnjKPLEHagPdUBw64IvyYFW
Ku6x0Pwj9xtmBX9PmDWxsidVnaVEBPEk2ZoxUISyg6NP0Uq9lz7xVjxydG4niAtOQ9+T
qZHQ==
X-Received: by 10.68.237.167 with SMTP id vd7mr272988079pbc.161.1358314381514;
Tue, 15 Jan 2013 21:33:01 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.0.4] ([123.201.39.65])
by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id bv10sm1550783pab.14.2013.01.15.21.32.59
(version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128);
Tue, 15 Jan 2013 21:33:00 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <50F63B88.9060007@nileshgr.com>
Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2013 11:02:56 +0530
From: Nilesh Govindrajan <me@nileshgr.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/17.0 Thunderbird/17.0
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-user+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-user.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] java vs icedtea6
References: <50F5F525.4020107@iinet.net.au> <50F63453.9040602@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <50F63453.9040602@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQlSWYrdh+OrEkrUM6xLxIK5KZxoDpk9JUgby7JTzlM31zbea6P7KPavjXyZ7/TMjhcvIosb
X-Archives-Salt: 79c2e5c9-253e-4ffc-b0f6-1a81c9b2e655
X-Archives-Hash: c8047b5f7dc352a9143b58990a3e66af
On Wednesday 16 January 2013 10:32:11 AM IST, Kevin Brandstatter wrote:
> I'm curious as well about the potential exploitability of icedtea. I
> would think that since the icedtea vm is not the same as the sun/oracle
> one and so I don't think the code base is the same, which would mean an
> exploit in the sun/oracle jvm would not necessarily affect icedtea.
> However, I know very little on this matter and seeing as i think both
> are open sourced i have no idea how much or if there is any code overlap.
>
Oracle Java is open source?
--
Nilesh Govindarajan
http://nileshgr.com