From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9FBB413839C for ; Wed, 9 Jan 2013 15:17:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 124C021C2FC; Wed, 9 Jan 2013 15:17:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: from nm27.access.bullet.mail.mud.yahoo.com (nm27.access.bullet.mail.mud.yahoo.com [66.94.237.92]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7E1BF21C0A4 for ; Wed, 9 Jan 2013 15:15:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [66.94.237.126] by nm27.access.bullet.mail.mud.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 09 Jan 2013 15:15:56 -0000 Received: from [68.142.198.206] by tm1.access.bullet.mail.mud.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 09 Jan 2013 15:15:56 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] by smtp110.sbc.mail.mud.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 09 Jan 2013 15:15:56 -0000 X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 697150.67759.bm@smtp110.sbc.mail.mud.yahoo.com X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 X-YMail-OSG: DbX0BE8VM1k_S.f0a1lfnK9sZX_Iy_ZNy4xUd67PTFYCHUp f62L4QMm3Am5AIeMgG6W_ZCJRz9Ag2tyXohfjFtIsq0xwaW89sSGXoqqZJSL 0YfhSVmSpSPgeIeZRAPjZdc8J1Uk9dxlMn0_o.gdh24OQrpyUX_1pWsXSpRv bMMB1GX0JuDFsHfQyyabXxsbJVabO1xCh7HR.11yZbie5rQWY5r2SFjtCHsV SnKjLyEKuJVxBYHcMS9TuOWM9gWWcZy.qcQf5ypz825b5AcX.Yy9_2i1aSlT apExF_.Q8ifMnqFCjvGiKWqUEEdS3Fikp4skfcqG1OGe8xw5AEb0gGMh8x6S XVQjlPpbUXOnbgRXttti7aSiObydSWG3YX2IbPF9BXGwxfbNIwuAIMH53qJI N_wahnJnOG_zhCTvlONnQQoz8m8AQHjvqHnDt3SMqErptrF4nIDjQUhs0iEv dhLyfRKR3ZM9dwGxmX45cdQxCtKgA44iKvz6SzeRSW2mPFJXPFh6z6d9xHhG 5T_fEy.LsWhgDyyjDlTLDu3waDtbnFw-- X-Yahoo-SMTP: oM3WcDSswBC7zv73TQKEsi7eAZ0- Received: from [192.168.1.2] (w41ter@69.234.191.113 with plain) by smtp110.sbc.mail.mud.yahoo.com with SMTP; 09 Jan 2013 07:15:56 -0800 PST Message-ID: <50ED8A05.6040602@gmail.com> Date: Wed, 09 Jan 2013 07:17:25 -0800 From: walt User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:18.0) Gecko/20121128 Thunderbird/18.0 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: [gentoo-user] Re: OT: Fighting bit rot References: <50EB2BF7.4040109@binarywings.net> <3613897.q2tncFpUrH@localhost> <6930155.q1GHZzjNit@localhost> In-Reply-To: <6930155.q1GHZzjNit@localhost> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: 82058999-6233-48a5-ad67-31a45f076fb6 X-Archives-Hash: beb9b951afe899edc752a4cabbcade0d On 01/08/2013 08:40 PM, Volker Armin Hemmann wrote: > Am Dienstag, 8. Januar 2013, 19:11:19 schrieb James: >> Volker Armin Hemmann googlemail.com> writes: > >> Comments/guidance on ZFS vs BTFRS are welcome. I never used ZFS; googling >> suggests lots of disdain for ZFS ? Maybe someone knows a good article >> or wiki discussion where the various merits of the currently available file >> systems are presented? > > does btrfs support raid levels others than 1? > > zfs does. Is freaking easy to set up and to use. Can handle swap files and > supports dedup. > is not linux-only. Are you using the gentoo zfs and zfs-kmod packages to get zfs support? Are they ready for prime time?