From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 98E8C13838E for ; Wed, 9 Jan 2013 09:03:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id EF1ED21C249; Wed, 9 Jan 2013 09:03:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-gg0-f179.google.com (mail-gg0-f179.google.com [209.85.161.179]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C05C521C207 for ; Wed, 9 Jan 2013 09:02:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-gg0-f179.google.com with SMTP id q1so265866gge.24 for ; Wed, 09 Jan 2013 01:02:00 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject :references:in-reply-to:x-enigmail-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=RfWH+829nCCNmx3TPJ8HmPmOUAgl0uSVmNuS9NVAHLk=; b=SIHOYLHX0pzZnI92IBc+QIGbF1BZbij/ZKSjpza7zcwopHteDo+mO7yqv3Pm7Q+rkN V/aIj2z9ZBhH5J/GceL9T7gd5AIs9myM2uKFdu4+CNsqFM3dfrjAJS87JhQZGFdjgb2p KZNjmknfNS62oANDjcuorA8f2zZGsHlpdIud2+GXCNkXT4XDKPLPiUFx5vmOh6bizbOF JbK/XZsL51gZ/tfLGi1HAsDKw5RJ5fyZzWDQ7TWuKm9GWXNWUpdVA8FWzR2AFMXj4B8e QSqBvt93tTL89YWTOm29U3ymjM26lPdPvAjVIHbR4zHwdhlBnIBZRWijQek+DeF8/0nn Wfgw== X-Received: by 10.101.175.24 with SMTP id c24mr21482368anp.56.1357722119919; Wed, 09 Jan 2013 01:01:59 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.2.5] (adsl-65-0-94-18.jan.bellsouth.net. [65.0.94.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id w2sm73928162yhk.8.2013.01.09.01.01.58 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Wed, 09 Jan 2013 01:01:59 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <50ED3205.5050803@gmail.com> Date: Wed, 09 Jan 2013 03:01:57 -0600 From: Dale User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/17.0 SeaMonkey/2.14.1 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] PATA vs SATA kernel driver (was: 4 machines - no /dev/cdrom or /dev/dvd anymore) References: <50ED1969.3010309@st.com> In-Reply-To: <50ED1969.3010309@st.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.4.6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: d8dc2297-3d3e-405f-9d7a-6439926fd922 X-Archives-Hash: f1a253dd2011a9dd549fb6d8fea3ff99 Raffaele BELARDI wrote: > On 01/07/2013 08:35 AM, Dale wrote: >> As I understand it, /dev/hdxx is no longer >> supported on current kernels. All hard drives are /dev/sdxx and optical >> drives are /dev/sr0(1,2,3,4 etc). > Not true, I'm using /dev/hd for all my PATA HD and DVD drives and > /dev/sd for the SATA HDs. Systems are ~amd64. > > At the time /dev/sr was introduced I tried it and had problems on the > DVD burner (I don't recall which ones, maybe just related to the missing > /dev/dvd link) so I decided to stick with the old driver. > > Is there any advantage to switch to the SATA driver also for PATA drives? > > raffaele > Did you see this in menuconfig: < > ATA/ATAPI/MFM/RLL support **(DEPRECATED)** The last entry on the change log I found on my 3.5.3 kernel was this: * 4.61 Jan 22, 2004 - support hardware sector sizes other than 2kB, * Pascal Schmidt If you look at the ide.txt file, it still shows kernel version 2.6 so it has not been updated to show it is in a series 3 kernel. Since this is depreciated, which generally means no longer maintained, you are using very old drivers that are no longer maintained. According to the changelog, it has not been touched since 2004. I would think one huge advantage to switching would be drivers that are maintained. It may work but what if it has a problem that you don't see yet? I'm sure there are people on this list that are MUCH more familiar with kernels that can answer your question with even more details but I found that in less than five minutes on my own system. I didn't even need google. So, unless some other more knowledgeable kernel guru comes along, I would suggest you start using drivers that are not so outdated. I only have a regular desktop and my life doesn't rely on it but I would not use drivers that far out of date that are marked depreciated. I certainly wouldn't when newer and maintained drivers are so easily available in the same kernel. Hope that helps. Dale :-) :-) -- I am only responsible for what I said ... Not for what you understood or how you interpreted my words!