From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 224861382BA for ; Fri, 4 Jan 2013 19:53:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 8B5E221C065; Fri, 4 Jan 2013 19:53:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-oa0-f50.google.com (mail-oa0-f50.google.com [209.85.219.50]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D0F9721C0D7 for ; Fri, 4 Jan 2013 19:52:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-oa0-f50.google.com with SMTP id n16so15540368oag.9 for ; Fri, 04 Jan 2013 11:52:31 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=Io7Le5m1Co5VUNYe8ZPYnJsil3dPqdViobuXeOiR9ko=; b=SxhVPeRqVj/6CY+HlbysOtLh2Wm0oq1ITlRoG+jC7FKy/kTH7YCrq74wpRTTYtoPhK 2WrmxwnDNpKazglyQ/o0znB/V+lYXFUedbaxtKc0a9EyYN0+okFVS5UMtdWIpT6miQCt ko5H3JWCFL4558XCf28YVSCmjXH3I7i0uo3FrgWlr4MeHZ1N+3VJE8tjOdtXP8v9MvZF Pd55FtkEo0mQRg8QfQgYXRk5V226N5bjlku36nCPy7wsmnCrb+sMYIQ29Z4KM5Rrmjy3 u3nPmK2jeZnGQ9vPOd/DgIUrOVLpSSWvD4jgdwUbtWsfEXNU5YNEuaUIj4zdUwFcbxHr TINw== X-Received: by 10.182.0.19 with SMTP id 19mr34145763oba.15.1357329151033; Fri, 04 Jan 2013 11:52:31 -0800 (PST) Received: from [172.31.0.2] (cpe-75-87-85-32.kc.res.rr.com. [75.87.85.32]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id a9sm32936799oee.10.2013.01.04.11.52.30 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Fri, 04 Jan 2013 11:52:30 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <50E732FD.1040200@gmail.com> Date: Fri, 04 Jan 2013 13:52:29 -0600 From: "Dustin C. Hatch" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:20.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/20.0a1 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: udev downgrade References: <50E6745D.5020509@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Archives-Salt: 85461221-95e7-4e68-8a3b-bce90cbe0c2a X-Archives-Hash: cfba7b66a1dff53add1083143f06bf9c On 1/4/2013 10:23, James wrote: > Dustin C. Hatch gmail.com> writes: > > >> The problem is you are trying to downgrade sys-fs/udev but not >> virtual/udev. If you want to force using udev-171, you need to mask both >> the real and virtual atoms. Try this in /etc/portage/package.mask/udev: > >> >=sys-fs/udev-181 >> >=virtual/udev-181 > >> Then emerge -avuD1 udev and see if that fixes it. > > I get the downgrades you would expect: > > > > UD ] virtual/udev-171 [196] > UD ] sys-fs/udev-171-r9 > > I also get some weird companion downgrades: > > blocks B ] >x11-libs/qt-script-4.8.2-r9999:4 > (">x11-libs/qt-script-4.8.2-r9999:4" is blocking x11-libs/qt-declarative-4.8.2, > x11-libs/qt-webkit-4.8.2, x11-libs/qt-svg-4.8.2, x11-libs/qt-test-4.8.2, > x11-libs/qt-xmlpatterns-4.8.2, x11-libs/qt-multimedia-4.8.2, > x11-libs/qt-opengl-4.8.2) > [blocks B ] > I don't have Qt installed anywhere, so I can't reproduce that problem. I also don't see that particular version of qt-script in the tree, so I can't be sure, but my guess is some Qt dep that you already have installed depends on a newer version of udev than you will be getting after the downgrade, thus requiring it to downgrade as well. > and these: > > Multiple package instances within a single package slot have been pulled > !!! into the dependency graph, resulting in a slot conflict: > > virtual/udev:0 > > (virtual/udev-171::gentoo,ebuild scheduled for merge) pulled in by > =virtual/udev-171 required by (kde-base/kdelibs-4.9.3::gentoo, installed) > (and 17 more with the same problems) > > (virtual/udev-196::gentoo, installed) pulled in by > >=virtual/udev-180 required by (sys-fs/udev-196-r1::gentoo, installed) > (and 1 more with the same problem) > > sys-fs/udev:0 > > (sys-fs/udev-196-r1::gentoo, installed) pulled in by > >> =sys-fs/udev-196-r1[gudev?,hwdb?,introspection?,keymap?,selinux?,static-libs?] > required by (virtual/udev-196::gentoo, installed) > > (sys-fs/udev-171-r9::gentoo, ebuild scheduled for merge) pulled in by > ~sys-fs/udev-171[gudev?,hwdb?,introspection?,keymap?,selinux?] required by > (virtual/udev-171::gentoo, ebuild scheduled for merge) > > > > Does this look normal? > Yes, I expected something like that. In all likelihood, you'll need to completely remove sys-fs/udev and virtual/udev and then reinstall the older version. You'll probably want to do this in single user mode (i.e. `rc single`), so running programs don't crash suddenly. A reboot afterward is probably a good idea as well. -- ♫Dustin