From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B1F6A1382A5 for ; Fri, 4 Jan 2013 09:17:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 5A92521C003; Fri, 4 Jan 2013 09:17:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: from n.hanft.de (n.hanft.de [213.95.70.228]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E9E2E21C003 for ; Fri, 4 Jan 2013 09:16:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: from fileserver.hanft.de (fileserver.hanft.de [IPv6:2002:d55f:8597:0:a:f:5:14]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by n.hanft.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 52C581B8010 for ; Fri, 4 Jan 2013 10:16:34 +0100 (CET) Received: from mh.local (mh.local [10.15.5.50]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: mh) by fileserver.hanft.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D8207E60004; Fri, 4 Jan 2013 10:16:33 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <50E69DEF.4020002@hanft.de> Date: Fri, 04 Jan 2013 10:16:31 +0100 From: Matthias Hanft User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/17.0 SeaMonkey/2.14.1 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: udev downgrade References: <20130104030921.GV20719@server> In-Reply-To: <20130104030921.GV20719@server> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Archives-Salt: 7ae6b603-e112-4543-bf1c-6c15100cfc15 X-Archives-Hash: 8d5094ae7822d6c8c854d2d116c69809 Bruce Hill wrote: >=20 > Too late, too tired, but do you have: >> =3Dsys-fs/udev-181 > in /etc/portage/package.mask ? Ehm... according to http://packages.gentoo.org/category/sys-fs?full_cat udev-171-r9 is the only stable x86 version, and udev-181 doesn't exist at all?! -Matt (still using 171 because at emerge -u world, an update never appear= ed)