From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BDAEE13829F for ; Fri, 4 Jan 2013 06:20:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 09E6621C061; Fri, 4 Jan 2013 06:20:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-oa0-f45.google.com (mail-oa0-f45.google.com [209.85.219.45]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8205621C042 for ; Fri, 4 Jan 2013 06:19:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-oa0-f45.google.com with SMTP id i18so14927960oag.32 for ; Thu, 03 Jan 2013 22:19:10 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=ONWpRkGO+htDaGI3Xtri9vcASAEWM8KnRSenJ99qMqY=; b=x213/z2s60Xcl509xoFXEZk+4lJJj1fbpNG3MWwFKZP6T93ghdydytsPuIDZhhMrsg nU4DRYihQiPY3Po0kQY07iHGEpfkvVmxseIbteMUY2Gnvwb1KwwA1pz5VyMzN72Ac3Pz kWFgvserDWsHL1DMRX5QcHhyK8Jd97lrQGMQLsY9PAw7DWQyXrk+cQl4cW1jfAWazj9g lccr36MUi/1OJgOy2sW0Vvg2KGuE++w6saXGGXk+k5hxLrDpycFYQ2ptC3bGGCQognpw zPYIWfnQf1sR8Pvxwxv17dAHA2KYDrOm62T9unA27ct4oo7Sp19KI8WUjjSh+ISioh2R TvMw== X-Received: by 10.60.5.231 with SMTP id v7mr29066757oev.62.1357280350733; Thu, 03 Jan 2013 22:19:10 -0800 (PST) Received: from [172.31.0.2] (cpe-75-87-85-32.kc.res.rr.com. [75.87.85.32]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id a9sm32772750oee.10.2013.01.03.22.19.09 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Thu, 03 Jan 2013 22:19:10 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <50E6745D.5020509@gmail.com> Date: Fri, 04 Jan 2013 00:19:09 -0600 From: "Dustin C. Hatch" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:20.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/20.0a1 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: udev downgrade References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Archives-Salt: d5cded92-2987-4de4-b141-1d9217637fe2 X-Archives-Hash: bcc15e9ced09b31e45f8385ae2ad6d3a On 1/3/2013 20:54, James wrote: > James tampabay.rr.com> writes: > > >> So unless somebody can give me good reason, I'm downgrading to >> udev-171 asap on this (only) system running udev 196....... >> (ps, I like to experiment, but not with udev et. al.) > > Long night, when you have to answer your own posts..... > > Now I get: > > > emerge -p1u udev > > These are the packages that would be merged, in order: > > Calculating dependencies... done! > [ebuild UD ] sys-fs/udev-171-r9 [196-r1] USE="rule_generator%* > -action_modeswitch% -build% -debug% -edd% (-extras) -floppy% {-test%}" > [blocks B ] sys-fs/udev-init-scripts-17-r1) > > !!! Multiple package instances within a single package slot have been pulled > !!! into the dependency graph, resulting in a slot conflict: > > sys-fs/udev:0 > > (sys-fs/udev-196-r1::gentoo, installed) pulled in by > >> =sys-fs/udev-196-r1[gudev?,hwdb?,introspection?,keymap?,selinux?,static-libs?] > required by (virtual/udev-196::gentoo, installed) > > (sys-fs/udev-171-r9::gentoo, ebuild scheduled for merge) pulled in by > (no parents that aren't satisfied by other packages in this slot) > > > ideas? > > > James > > The problem is you are trying to downgrade sys-fs/udev but not virtual/udev. If you want to force using udev-171, you need to mask both the real and virtual atoms. Try this in /etc/portage/package.mask/udev: >=sys-fs/udev-181 >=virtual/udev-181 Then emerge -avuD1 udev and see if that fixes it. -- ♫Dustin