From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gentoo-user+bounces-144030-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>
Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80])
	by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 01D101381FA
	for <garchives@archives.gentoo.org>; Sun, 30 Dec 2012 22:44:22 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 9456521C008;
	Sun, 30 Dec 2012 22:44:08 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail2.viabit.com (mail2.viabit.com [65.246.80.16])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D481DE062B
	for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Sun, 30 Dec 2012 22:42:57 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from [172.17.29.6] (vpn1.metro-data.com [65.213.236.242])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by mail2.viabit.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3YZGrZ6SKsz1hfN
	for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Sun, 30 Dec 2012 17:42:54 -0500 (EST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=orlitzky.com; s=mail2;
	t=1356907375; bh=NEp55iV5IE2UMi6Fiqu01UC3CDJMafEtkMamMnksAyQ=;
	h=Date:From:To:Subject:References:In-Reply-To;
	b=Pu8OqQvLoaCmH91wmUZ/eciBZo74Dm8TNQoHw7fFUF/TTC8pgf807uHfOWcZak/zc
	 0YaXRsc4EmNaPJ1MDyaNmssonPcUtyeUe7igKeh1JXHqxWwN3QuZhUGmjmjZ0qagyd
	 cPrIbsik+UTcXnLkq8zqzwjkExLh9ZUQrr5r11F0=
Message-ID: <50E0C369.6030207@orlitzky.com>
Date: Sun, 30 Dec 2012 17:42:49 -0500
From: Michael Orlitzky <michael@orlitzky.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:10.0.10) Gecko/20121104 Thunderbird/10.0.10
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-user+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-user.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] IPTABLES syntax change?
References: <20121227004732.GB5854@waltdnes.org> <50DBA7D0.4060800@orlitzky.com> <87zk0zivjk.fsf@einstein.gmurray.org.uk> <20121227231150.GA9864@waltdnes.org> <50DCDEAF.9020002@orlitzky.com> <20121228035937.GA2949@waltdnes.org> <50DD370F.4070509@orlitzky.com> <20121229024605.GB5340@waltdnes.org> <50DE6A94.3060904@fastmail.co.uk> <20121229183221.GA6975@waltdnes.org>
In-Reply-To: <20121229183221.GA6975@waltdnes.org>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.3.5
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Archives-Salt: 5c9bc906-4119-48be-aa6e-2ae270a9e27a
X-Archives-Hash: 8317e5f33c9db564eb2ee37dd6ff1759

On 12/29/2012 01:32 PM, Walter Dnes wrote:
>   Two questions I'm not sure about.
> 
> 1) I run a desktop, and use passive ftp.  Is there any need for me to
> accept RELATED packets?
> 

Probably not, I think the server needs it though.


> 2) Does a "-j LOG" return to the chain it was called from, or does it do
> an implicit DROP?
> 

It returns to spot where it was called from.