From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C8F2C1381FB for ; Tue, 25 Dec 2012 21:43:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 4A05521C026; Tue, 25 Dec 2012 21:43:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-yh0-f46.google.com (mail-yh0-f46.google.com [209.85.213.46]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E2BE621C0C4 for ; Tue, 25 Dec 2012 21:42:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-yh0-f46.google.com with SMTP id m54so1443594yhm.19 for ; Tue, 25 Dec 2012 13:42:25 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject :references:in-reply-to:x-enigmail-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=O1UadvqLGnLzP6oVn8HC3J0ge5RZpf31ZF+JlIYy4gM=; b=fqm5NrdLLur9j3Sy94JD5FSxg/+89CwduXND0HBdO2l3E6hsU7fQ9b2b3S8hyrSCQk z0G2vbukcLAUtXK1KYUGBu8NKhLiYuABloltl6zNezI+nBGHg9uOg+Uit8x+ciI7whkG IibX3cepyVtK7ncxHA42vCV+vzxmctzD5iQiR89uwZLJxSntCdE/kiOTi3UDLusCgfJj rFBFtH8oZexAwMCNVe18FBEPK46CXeN43Z6i6s6x0oWK46Dyhtt/QfM+ejxX6VhnKEDX 7FhgmgllH16jvLu9/ZBREfxjtoYhxITscSqyJm3ru3s0hV+XpnKAS9P22H22Qwj67ocB FWrg== X-Received: by 10.236.74.106 with SMTP id w70mr23351609yhd.68.1356471745035; Tue, 25 Dec 2012 13:42:25 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.2.5] (adsl-65-0-94-18.jan.bellsouth.net. [65.0.94.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id k1sm19938517anl.11.2012.12.25.13.42.23 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Tue, 25 Dec 2012 13:42:24 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <50DA1DBE.9070002@gmail.com> Date: Tue, 25 Dec 2012 15:42:22 -0600 From: Dale User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/17.0 SeaMonkey/2.14.1 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Anyone switched to eudev yet? References: <50CB1942.3020900@gmail.com> <50CB5406.7040404@gmail.com> <8738z7hgsa.fsf@ist.utl.pt> <20121216171043.71084070@khamul.example.com> <20121217104621.735bf43a@khamul.example.com> <20121218163332.7956f31a@khamul.example.com> <87txrd6pb3.fsf@ist.utl.pt> <20121223182037.1553813f@khamul.example.com> <87bodk7lb6.fsf@ist.utl.pt> <20121224085528.56f535ec@khamul.example.com> <50D85167.9060309@gmail.com> <20121224204817.335033c6@khamul.example.com> <50D8B467.4080100@gmail.com> <50D8D8D6.8090701@gmail.com> <50D9107E.8070406@gmail.com> <20121225211523.4b27426e@digimed.co.uk> In-Reply-To: <20121225211523.4b27426e@digimed.co.uk> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.4.6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: c7bd854a-62ab-4172-a7db-82a8c56a8956 X-Archives-Hash: 0a5dabb8646deed0ec11e64ff0a2035c Neil Bothwick wrote: > On Mon, 24 Dec 2012 20:33:34 -0600, Dale wrote: > >> Putting /usr on LVM is not the problem. I have had /usr on LVM for a >> good long while now. It has booted just fine. The new udev is what is >> going to break it, whether I use LVM or not from what has been said on >> this list and elsewhere. > I've been running separate /usr on LVM with ~arch udev and no initramfs > on a couple of systems with no problems. The news item is taking the easy > way out by saying "it will break" rather than "it may break" - such > breakage is by no means certain - although the future holds no > guarantees. > > Then there is my luck. Right? Dale :-) :-) -- I am only responsible for what I said ... Not for what you understood or how you interpreted my words!