From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gentoo-user+bounces-143816-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>
Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80])
by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C8F2C1381FB
for <garchives@archives.gentoo.org>; Tue, 25 Dec 2012 21:43:47 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 4A05521C026;
Tue, 25 Dec 2012 21:43:34 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-yh0-f46.google.com (mail-yh0-f46.google.com [209.85.213.46])
(using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E2BE621C0C4
for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Tue, 25 Dec 2012 21:42:25 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-yh0-f46.google.com with SMTP id m54so1443594yhm.19
for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Tue, 25 Dec 2012 13:42:25 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
h=x-received:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject
:references:in-reply-to:x-enigmail-version:content-type
:content-transfer-encoding;
bh=O1UadvqLGnLzP6oVn8HC3J0ge5RZpf31ZF+JlIYy4gM=;
b=fqm5NrdLLur9j3Sy94JD5FSxg/+89CwduXND0HBdO2l3E6hsU7fQ9b2b3S8hyrSCQk
z0G2vbukcLAUtXK1KYUGBu8NKhLiYuABloltl6zNezI+nBGHg9uOg+Uit8x+ciI7whkG
IibX3cepyVtK7ncxHA42vCV+vzxmctzD5iQiR89uwZLJxSntCdE/kiOTi3UDLusCgfJj
rFBFtH8oZexAwMCNVe18FBEPK46CXeN43Z6i6s6x0oWK46Dyhtt/QfM+ejxX6VhnKEDX
7FhgmgllH16jvLu9/ZBREfxjtoYhxITscSqyJm3ru3s0hV+XpnKAS9P22H22Qwj67ocB
FWrg==
X-Received: by 10.236.74.106 with SMTP id w70mr23351609yhd.68.1356471745035;
Tue, 25 Dec 2012 13:42:25 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.2.5] (adsl-65-0-94-18.jan.bellsouth.net. [65.0.94.18])
by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id k1sm19938517anl.11.2012.12.25.13.42.23
(version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER);
Tue, 25 Dec 2012 13:42:24 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <50DA1DBE.9070002@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 25 Dec 2012 15:42:22 -0600
From: Dale <rdalek1967@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/17.0 SeaMonkey/2.14.1
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-user+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-user.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Anyone switched to eudev yet?
References: <50CB1942.3020900@gmail.com> <CAK2H+ecBb-nJ-ZY1efRT+sNCq6v9xgWnwL4GVpY-2j-GNTpJeA@mail.gmail.com> <50CB5406.7040404@gmail.com> <CAK2H+efpby+2NnbjReXyGjN3=Xe63j_2K69kCZjDhZcHvjusdA@mail.gmail.com> <8738z7hgsa.fsf@ist.utl.pt> <20121216171043.71084070@khamul.example.com> <CAG2nJkNDLDp2hkz34XXEen4SO1_Mm18G8NNDMZK6tqDr+ddWtA@mail.gmail.com> <20121217104621.735bf43a@khamul.example.com> <CA+czFiD+Yv_PXctATd6EYws8kpqb3WFesLZU47jMN5ZJmy3oww@mail.gmail.com> <20121218163332.7956f31a@khamul.example.com> <87txrd6pb3.fsf@ist.utl.pt> <20121223182037.1553813f@khamul.example.com> <87bodk7lb6.fsf@ist.utl.pt> <20121224085528.56f535ec@khamul.example.com> <50D85167.9060309@gmail.com> <20121224204817.335033c6@khamul.example.com> <50D8B467.4080100@gmail.com> <CAK2H+efOgw=gjMd-7b5ftH9KtgehBXcHRiAm4w1x6p5-vry4uQ@mail.gmail.com> <50D8D8D6.8090701@gmail.com> <CAK2H+ecoTndDLxS5S4oybhUjkdD8fkCypV-kAjzV9Q7zZPSGYg@mail.gmail.com> <50D9107E.8070406@gmail.com> <20121225211523.4b27426e@digimed.co.uk>
In-Reply-To: <20121225211523.4b27426e@digimed.co.uk>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.4.6
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Archives-Salt: c7bd854a-62ab-4172-a7db-82a8c56a8956
X-Archives-Hash: 0a5dabb8646deed0ec11e64ff0a2035c
Neil Bothwick wrote:
> On Mon, 24 Dec 2012 20:33:34 -0600, Dale wrote:
>
>> Putting /usr on LVM is not the problem. I have had /usr on LVM for a
>> good long while now. It has booted just fine. The new udev is what is
>> going to break it, whether I use LVM or not from what has been said on
>> this list and elsewhere.
> I've been running separate /usr on LVM with ~arch udev and no initramfs
> on a couple of systems with no problems. The news item is taking the easy
> way out by saying "it will break" rather than "it may break" - such
> breakage is by no means certain - although the future holds no
> guarantees.
>
>
Then there is my luck. Right?
Dale
:-) :-)
--
I am only responsible for what I said ... Not for what you understood or how you interpreted my words!