From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gentoo-user+bounces-143812-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>
Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80])
by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7DE0F1381FB
for <garchives@archives.gentoo.org>; Tue, 25 Dec 2012 21:07:28 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 214FF21C046;
Tue, 25 Dec 2012 21:07:13 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-gh0-f179.google.com (mail-gh0-f179.google.com [209.85.160.179])
(using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E281121C022
for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Tue, 25 Dec 2012 21:05:59 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-gh0-f179.google.com with SMTP id r14so735351ghr.10
for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Tue, 25 Dec 2012 13:05:59 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
h=x-received:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject
:references:in-reply-to:x-enigmail-version:content-type
:content-transfer-encoding;
bh=+zMCLKIc7NTq+6B0AIMYADIgjefvVqEOiG09di8J8bk=;
b=DKW2OBhg8ankjCTmnnA0CFXdNI5JD8/Wa6ofcD0YDCHe4FZyeWD7mJUcoKUHynMOk2
hXYU85dfHsaY0nca1pNTgcSHPRKwdpC1LTB6sb+J2r4MUO92Nqi67Gv4MN8Fm5Lmr0kC
9tkExOhUDYC+ujfaXWUZHr/k8UgtQVD+FFd51Pxh62RQ3t/NsgHsru5K6/noNFTI1Yr5
i7MMdBzrK95BFkdg/McXud+LC3ni+xQHtBNgXzdn7iU8Ivpc3X6cZGiU1FQwuSdOAN3u
9ZFsF4sNjdGb3FXLP5TbaZqcYhAdHOuCyaqxQUa67wwmGOWLqJnlNa5EemRnf1Od6fqk
QMpQ==
X-Received: by 10.236.193.225 with SMTP id k61mr22949475yhn.25.1356469559058;
Tue, 25 Dec 2012 13:05:59 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.2.5] (adsl-65-0-94-18.jan.bellsouth.net. [65.0.94.18])
by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id z1sm19881548anj.2.2012.12.25.13.05.57
(version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER);
Tue, 25 Dec 2012 13:05:58 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <50DA1535.1030102@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 25 Dec 2012 15:05:57 -0600
From: Dale <rdalek1967@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/17.0 SeaMonkey/2.14.1
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-user+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-user.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Anyone switched to eudev yet?
References: <CAG2nJkNDLDp2hkz34XXEen4SO1_Mm18G8NNDMZK6tqDr+ddWtA@mail.gmail.com> <20121217104621.735bf43a@khamul.example.com> <CA+czFiD+Yv_PXctATd6EYws8kpqb3WFesLZU47jMN5ZJmy3oww@mail.gmail.com> <20121218163332.7956f31a@khamul.example.com> <87txrd6pb3.fsf@ist.utl.pt> <20121223182037.1553813f@khamul.example.com> <87bodk7lb6.fsf@ist.utl.pt> <20121223172053.GB23711@acm.acm> <877go87jec.fsf@ist.utl.pt> <20121223203941.20fdd9a7@digimed.co.uk> <20121224012724.GA23138@waltdnes.org> <CAG2nJkONv90_FOJjCUed80KEE0LbQz=hm5qkROx+xJXMh2_zug@mail.gmail.com> <20121224125857.026d180b@khamul.example.com> <853345.97532.bm@smtp146.mail.ukl.yahoo.com> <50D87A32.3010107@gmail.com> <50D8E0BD.4060402@iinet.net.au> <20121225203944.7dc737ed@digimed.co.uk>
In-Reply-To: <20121225203944.7dc737ed@digimed.co.uk>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.4.6
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Archives-Salt: 8f590f5d-0883-437e-b664-aff8824313c3
X-Archives-Hash: 10425f70d28afd3ff367f337cf77a588
Neil Bothwick wrote:
> On Tue, 25 Dec 2012 07:09:49 +0800, William Kenworthy wrote:
>
>> I used initrd's many years ago, and separate /usr and/ until on a redhat
>> system I rebooted with an out of sequence initrd and kernel on a
>> critical server (the sort of thing that puts your employment at risk
>> when there are 20 odd developers using it ...)
> That's the main reason I build the initramfs into the kernel rather than
> as a separate file. That way you know that each kernel will always
> continue to work, you can't screw up the initramfs of a working kernel.
>
>
That was my thinking too. I never got it to work. I went to plan B
which was dracut.
Dale
:-) :-)
--
I am only responsible for what I said ... Not for what you understood or how you interpreted my words!