From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gentoo-user+bounces-143757-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>
Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80])
by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3996E13820D
for <garchives@archives.gentoo.org>; Tue, 25 Dec 2012 01:56:18 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id F423421C041;
Tue, 25 Dec 2012 01:56:02 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-gh0-f169.google.com (mail-gh0-f169.google.com [209.85.160.169])
(using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E758A21C003
for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Tue, 25 Dec 2012 01:54:50 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-gh0-f169.google.com with SMTP id r11so680100ghr.14
for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Mon, 24 Dec 2012 17:54:50 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
h=x-received:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject
:references:in-reply-to:x-enigmail-version:content-type
:content-transfer-encoding;
bh=nzwwh8gK21srrucmqpXpQadcuBHnBd2HuCFY04cw7yY=;
b=AodMbDBvUTRJb66WA0yMicy6QVbnxsfI3M0bANPSmq/+9cdAZSYF0ZSrxRf/GZOS9A
jHZSVKFv17Xi+QXOkmURYJLV+z5fTXIXZJe+93//m3b7svxV8kTpA5ygyfGYU0XoK78n
fytjYe9JM7FtpquPh2wGRxAgZk+ZXFTcu1oWrnf/lNXP+GY9vuB3x+fn5mJHmeluGR3r
z1JYqgcBSH/AIV9a81FIB/G+5nsFfKJWOrf4vNwoN5DKZbUBTtjKSHww3ahLbtEWokMX
c0qgjHFXKv4eO8HR5Qdg6l4UcSuY/L9635yTkF33jd1vWrFNPCS/0eVZWVLMfeR2kYzZ
wkAA==
X-Received: by 10.236.125.110 with SMTP id y74mr21164896yhh.19.1356400489947;
Mon, 24 Dec 2012 17:54:49 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.2.5] (adsl-65-0-94-18.jan.bellsouth.net. [65.0.94.18])
by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id q48sm20599584yhk.7.2012.12.24.17.54.48
(version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER);
Mon, 24 Dec 2012 17:54:49 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <50D90767.6090202@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 24 Dec 2012 19:54:47 -0600
From: Dale <rdalek1967@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/17.0 SeaMonkey/2.14.1
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-user+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-user.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Anyone switched to eudev yet?
References: <87txrd6pb3.fsf@ist.utl.pt> <20121223182037.1553813f@khamul.example.com> <87bodk7lb6.fsf@ist.utl.pt> <20121224085528.56f535ec@khamul.example.com> <50D85167.9060309@gmail.com> <87hanb60xh.fsf@ist.utl.pt> <50D85F68.609@gmail.com> <CAG2nJkP3-ZA98r9Pt6r5-aCz6qzAguEjAD3=k2W0HO-kcqMmxQ@mail.gmail.com> <20121224164120.GI26547@server> <50D88B55.5030808@gmail.com> <20121224171530.GK26547@server> <CAG2nJkP5ZBbBERe0ABCfj6bU=LXpLyd39zoOHLeHCs0BhVBn2A@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAG2nJkP5ZBbBERe0ABCfj6bU=LXpLyd39zoOHLeHCs0BhVBn2A@mail.gmail.com>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.4.6
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Archives-Salt: 682f41be-5498-421e-9456-499bccbc27d2
X-Archives-Hash: f27806ceec04ededa07dc32e9773fc5a
Mark David Dumlao wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 25, 2012 at 1:15 AM, Bruce Hill
> <daddy@happypenguincomputers.com> wrote:
>> On Mon, Dec 24, 2012 at 11:05:25AM -0600, Dale wrote:
>>> Bruce Hill wrote:
>>>
>>> <<< SNIP >>>
>>>> No initrd...
>>> YET!!! ROFL
>>>
>>> When eudev goes stable, then we can disregard that yet. ;-)
>>>
>>> Dale
>> devfs still works wonderfully ... for principle, if no other reason, that file
>> server will *NEVER* have an initrd image
> You shouldn't need to wait for eudev.
>
> Technically any early mount system configured and done _before_ udev
> should do the trick. I mean, it's not like udev is even *essential*
> for boot - that we happen to depend on it is just a matter of
> convenience. Shouldn't be hard to write an rc script that does just
> that for anyone that hates init thingies bad enough. Just hardcode an
> n-second sleep and plug in the kernel detected device name. Do rc
> scripts count as "init thingies"? :)
> --
> This email is: [ ] actionable [ ] fyi [x] social
> Response needed: [ ] yes [x] up to you [ ] no
> Time-sensitive: [ ] immediate [ ] soon [x] none
>
>
Is that what eudev is going to do? I follow -dev and according to the
eudev people they are going to support a separate /usr with no init
thingy. So, they have a plan to do this. From what they were posting,
they seem pretty sure they can do this.
I'm just waiting on eudev to get stable. It was posted that the one in
the tree still needs a couple fixes and then it will be ready for some
testing. Heck, I'll gladly test it whenever they say it boots and KDE
will work. Heck, just booting is a good start. lol
Dale
:-) :-)
--
I am only responsible for what I said ... Not for what you understood or how you interpreted my words!