From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A2421381F3 for ; Tue, 18 Dec 2012 04:57:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 6D65521C0B4; Tue, 18 Dec 2012 04:57:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-pb0-f45.google.com (mail-pb0-f45.google.com [209.85.160.45]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 985A121C0A9 for ; Tue, 18 Dec 2012 04:56:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-pb0-f45.google.com with SMTP id mc8so137337pbc.18 for ; Mon, 17 Dec 2012 20:56:10 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding :x-gm-message-state; bh=XrwbkVuD16GBKvk9TCcEjqvnbkQJgtv+qPeGHhpKm/c=; b=GVNtizM6wp5m4KyojsbBO49jSN1osRH3BWdDE/W4gGOn7pbzMPT4Gc8wee0wJNxdtj Shi21lHO9ioiRFYR+poLRKtss8JnMsAjdIIky+wr65CJo4G8CV4N+zP08OaiO9A9vn7z Ad5bMA3zoTiUO0LenTCrOvDVqRgDA9e9RXG0hwxdc43+UDcEPKJ6kAYiLtbFsGUsc8Yk EFAVUDRrRhXauQ3ujQwIxfqT5ghnJILmfSb5hkmGM02NqwvvlnkqAQoCgyzoNb7hgcUG wyDDCo0en7qd69up1ADWcI0Vv3t2PUap3+AGVwbATKp3/FwFK1xp6Po8K0QwSyDEbjNN IGUw== X-Received: by 10.69.0.40 with SMTP id av8mr2661183pbd.117.1355806570247; Mon, 17 Dec 2012 20:56:10 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.0.7] ([123.201.39.71]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id bc1sm708709pab.3.2012.12.17.20.56.08 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Mon, 17 Dec 2012 20:56:09 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <50CFF766.3010308@nileshgr.com> Date: Tue, 18 Dec 2012 10:26:06 +0530 From: Nilesh Govindrajan User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/17.0 Thunderbird/17.0 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] {OT} A simple routing problem References: <50CFE274.7070204@nileshgr.com> <50CFE564.4030709@gmail.com> <50CFE69A.7030502@nileshgr.com> <50CFE901.4060500@gmail.com> <50CFEA56.30304@nileshgr.com> <50CFECC4.6080500@gmail.com> <50CFEF93.5010705@nileshgr.com> In-Reply-To: <50CFEF93.5010705@nileshgr.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQlUULA/cretnU+WEs74rB4ZNxtDxt4T0DYj2v0CS63p9uKdMxoBZ6Db5oGpxyUC2BnUDpor X-Archives-Salt: 58c8f89b-c03f-482c-981c-0e78f5ec07d8 X-Archives-Hash: 7c818718d3ae3f9014ab462462936f92 On Tuesday 18 December 2012 09:52:43 AM IST, Nilesh Govindrajan wrote: > On Tuesday 18 December 2012 09:40:44 AM IST, Kevin Brandstatter wrote: >> On 12/17/2012 08:00 PM, Nilesh Govindrajan wrote: >>> On Tuesday 18 December 2012 09:24:41 AM IST, Kevin Brandstatter >>> wrote: >>>> On 12/17/2012 07:44 PM, Nilesh Govindrajan wrote: >>>>> On Tuesday 18 December 2012 09:09:16 AM IST, Kevin >>>>> Brandstatter wrote: >>>>>> On 12/17/2012 07:26 PM, Nilesh Govindrajan wrote: >>>>>>> Hi, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I'm stuck with a routing issue: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I have a DD-WRT router, which has one WAN port and four >>>>>>> LAN ports with WiFi. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I have a fiber connection which is connected by dialing >>>>>>> PPPoE using pppd on the router, so I have no choice but to >>>>>>> connect the fiber connection on WAN port. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I have yet another (much slower) ADSL link, with it's own >>>>>>> router (LAN-only). I'm trying to connect the router to the >>>>>>> DD-WRT router's LAN port. I'm able to access the router, >>>>>>> but routing through the gateway (the ADSL router) fails. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Here's a simple diagram: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> The LAN network I'm using on DDWRT is 192.168.0.0, which >>>>>>> is the LAN network for the internal side and WiFi. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> The fiber connection is obviously public network. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> The other ADSL connection can be configured to change >>>>>>> subnet, it has a LAN side and WAN side. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> How I can I route through the ADSL router without requiring >>>>>>> a separate NIC/network for it? >>>>>>> >>>>>> what exactly are you trying to route? traffic out to the >>>>>> internet over the ADSL? or just trying to connect the >>>>>> machines on that router to the fiber line and route all >>>>>> traffic from both out on the fiber? >>>>>> >>>>>> -Kevin >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Actually my fiber connection has a smaller limit than the ADSL >>>>> connection. I am trying to use the fiber connection for all >>>>> activities except some torrent downloading for which I want to >>>>> use my ADSL connection. Once I'm able to route through the >>>>> ADSL gateway, it would be easy for me to setup another ip on >>>>> eth0 on my machine on which transmission could listen. All >>>>> traffic on that ip would be routed through ADSL and otherwise >>>>> the fiber. >>>>> >>>>> -- Nilesh Govindarajan http://nileshgr.com >>>>> >>>> well in that case if you know how to set it up so that the >>>> dd-wrt router can see the ADSL gateway you can set a route on >>>> your box to route traffic on a specific device to that gateway. >>>> In fact, you might even be able to static route the torrent ports >>>> to that gateway from dd-wrt >>>> >>>> -Kevin >>> >>> >>> I tried that. As the simplest test, I added this on ddwrt: >>> >>> route add -host 8.8.8.8 gw 192.168.0.32 >>> >>> Where 192.168.0.32 is the private IP of my ADSL router. But when I >>> say ping 8.8.8.8 from ddwrt, I don't get any response. Any idea why >>> this happens? >>> >>> -- Nilesh Govindarajan http://nileshgr.com >>> >> is the ADSL configured to forward to the internet? how is the gateway >> set up? it needs to be configured to route the outbound traffic to the >> internet >> >> -Kevin > > Yes, I have a static IP on the ADSL connection and it is setup for the > same. Connects using MER and NAT is enabled. > If I connect the router to DD-WRT's WAN port and change subnet of the > ADSL private network (matching the same on WAN interface), then it > works properly. > > -- > Nilesh Govindarajan > http://nileshgr.com Wait, it just worked. Looks like I missed out something yesterday. Thanks for your help. -- Nilesh Govindarajan http://nileshgr.com