From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gentoo-user+bounces-143465-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>
Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80])
	by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E95761381F3
	for <garchives@archives.gentoo.org>; Mon, 17 Dec 2012 06:46:29 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 7A03B21C042;
	Mon, 17 Dec 2012 06:46:15 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-yh0-f52.google.com (mail-yh0-f52.google.com [209.85.213.52])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BED3D21C003
	for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Mon, 17 Dec 2012 06:45:00 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-yh0-f52.google.com with SMTP id o22so1126214yho.11
        for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Sun, 16 Dec 2012 22:45:00 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
        h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references
         :in-reply-to:x-enigmail-version:content-type
         :content-transfer-encoding;
        bh=N0Hgtu5kinu4FaikmpY8yTbHOdHLY/E09u3uvVhcIgw=;
        b=dSN6+iyJrwyHNnB92cudW6JaN65MMOuJc93fO+NHzu3biltIwrpmyDt8ayXniR4aqr
         jCeA3MAOSO/Pi3Mru0l+ApQmmQ+hHW25QEMnc8uv1xlITlGE2MDC7P3r6k2w/EgAh6Fh
         oW5gBeYfeMTW7EISYORXqBM7QMXVLf85AjvJuRoZpPE+I2mziUnffXrouMIsv0pQQKCU
         UHivzRcCKCC0z2GcKD/4D/mArcMAxaWb5KD9qWp3eUIq+84ef/6Ym/dEyX+z1//SLVX9
         WCoROtljs7cq4/Eu//du/bmdTHaZQ2YIdLAdAlx21LzpYq8DwUEMmXKdIUiMhAuTSa8Y
         9ZXw==
Received: by 10.236.135.238 with SMTP id u74mr13090652yhi.52.1355726700015;
        Sun, 16 Dec 2012 22:45:00 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.2.5] (adsl-65-0-94-18.jan.bellsouth.net. [65.0.94.18])
        by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id s21sm12345363yhb.5.2012.12.16.22.44.58
        (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER);
        Sun, 16 Dec 2012 22:44:59 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <50CEBF69.6070608@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 17 Dec 2012 00:44:57 -0600
From: Dale <rdalek1967@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/17.0 SeaMonkey/2.14.1
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-user+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-user.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Anyone switched to eudev yet?
References: <50CB1942.3020900@gmail.com> <CAK2H+ecMZ5JO+SGBAdwhGO0HnB8Za-6_EaS1OiQcEJ03a0iQVg@mail.gmail.com> <50CB4A3C.1030109@gmail.com> <CAK2H+ecBb-nJ-ZY1efRT+sNCq6v9xgWnwL4GVpY-2j-GNTpJeA@mail.gmail.com> <50CB5406.7040404@gmail.com> <CAK2H+efpby+2NnbjReXyGjN3=Xe63j_2K69kCZjDhZcHvjusdA@mail.gmail.com> <8738z7hgsa.fsf@ist.utl.pt> <20121216171043.71084070@khamul.example.com> <20121216184953.GD16560@server> <876241d9gn.fsf@ist.utl.pt> <20121217002613.294cff70@kc-sys.chadwicks.me.uk> <50CEB13A.1040601@gmail.com> <50CEB443.9040200@orlitzky.com> <50CEB70C.8090200@gmail.com> <50CEBAA4.6090007@orlitzky.com>
In-Reply-To: <50CEBAA4.6090007@orlitzky.com>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.4.6
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Archives-Salt: 27b3c09c-8518-4568-a7c4-db281998c88b
X-Archives-Hash: e4510af8a6f843b31226d8aeb4302b2a

Michael Orlitzky wrote:
> On 12/17/2012 01:09 AM, Dale wrote:
>> So, since I have /usr separate from the rest, I could mount it read only
>> and reduce the chance of corruption if say my UPS failed?  I already do
>> this for /boot.  Interesting.  Very interesting indeed. 
>>
>> If the other issues happen, computers is likely the least of our
>> problems.  ;-) 
>>
> Yes, although it's unlikely that any corruption would occur in the first
> place if you're not writing to the filesystem during the crash.
>
>


But unlikely is not equal to zero.  Murphy's law.  o_O 

Dale

:-)  :-) 

-- 
I am only responsible for what I said ... Not for what you understood or how you interpreted my words!