From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB1911381F3 for ; Mon, 17 Dec 2012 05:58:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 5516B21C025; Mon, 17 Dec 2012 05:58:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail2.viabit.com (mail2.viabit.com [65.246.80.16]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9677021C05B for ; Mon, 17 Dec 2012 05:57:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [172.17.29.6] (vpn1.metro-data.com [65.213.236.242]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail2.viabit.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3YPs8N6f6rz1hfK for ; Mon, 17 Dec 2012 00:57:24 -0500 (EST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=orlitzky.com; s=mail2; t=1355723845; bh=Hwo3CINlRNwoMLCy85cArwHZU9MU09WrFoTYsP0D0cQ=; h=Date:From:To:Subject:References:In-Reply-To; b=RF1TZE0q1rkfBRty7tMsWnKjw6FDxBu83fxDaX+QCTbdXnaK5DC7d9+R8XSeLn6nP EohZUdlczTmRReNWeFGSEdC9w0/SKQD5+WWKe7RJqeRKr8jRR54pcFYxrDi+E9r3Jz A5ati9btpPmRY3b2PTOvu8sIr1PwZcbAxIKvLuEY= Message-ID: <50CEB443.9040200@orlitzky.com> Date: Mon, 17 Dec 2012 00:57:23 -0500 From: Michael Orlitzky User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:10.0.10) Gecko/20121104 Thunderbird/10.0.10 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Anyone switched to eudev yet? References: <50CB1942.3020900@gmail.com> <50CB4A3C.1030109@gmail.com> <50CB5406.7040404@gmail.com> <8738z7hgsa.fsf@ist.utl.pt> <20121216171043.71084070@khamul.example.com> <20121216184953.GD16560@server> <876241d9gn.fsf@ist.utl.pt> <20121217002613.294cff70@kc-sys.chadwicks.me.uk> <50CEB13A.1040601@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <50CEB13A.1040601@gmail.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.3.5 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: b60d86ed-e624-48f0-a051-6aa73f46bab4 X-Archives-Hash: 486aa2733706bcf4731ad3ca4385d6dd On 12/17/2012 12:44 AM, Dale wrote: >> > > > Question. A file system, /usr for example, is mounted read only. The > system crashes for whatever reason such as a power failure. Since it is > mounted read only, would there be a larger or smaller risk of corrupted > data on that partition? From what I understand, the possible corruption > is from files not being written to the drive but since it is mounted > read only, then that removes that possibility. > > Just checking on a thought here. > Power failure? Your data is fine. But "whatever reason?" Think of the possibilities! * The Earth stops rotating and your hard drive is flung at 67,000 miles per hour directly into the sun. * Today is backwards day, and your ones and zeros have been switched. Fsck should be able to handle this, somebody file a bug. * The system never really existed, it was all in your imagination. Fade to credits.