From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 939D61381F3 for ; Fri, 14 Dec 2012 20:37:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 8CF5E21C05B; Fri, 14 Dec 2012 20:37:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: from out4-smtp.messagingengine.com (out4-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.28]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 56BED21C03C for ; Fri, 14 Dec 2012 20:35:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: from compute3.internal (compute3.nyi.mail.srv.osa [10.202.2.43]) by gateway1.nyi.mail.srv.osa (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC7D8201BF for ; Fri, 14 Dec 2012 15:35:53 -0500 (EST) Received: from frontend1.nyi.mail.srv.osa ([10.202.2.160]) by compute3.internal (MEProxy); Fri, 14 Dec 2012 15:35:53 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=binarywings.net; h=message-id:date:from:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type; s=mesmtp; bh=G7geD5LblesZNNODpIKwypMX akY=; b=ZLOwWyGiSJEI2yprYR6abZscyKegRiE4IqlLTMwCREbPntui+5V5OpKr jZJwhiFwCuymaZqEPHDneXeMzWLODDIlzm1hI19iID4epHvahrIbHZ9LXF7d9ZEp gqHoPZbo5VFfmoBCBk//fqwlJepFdSLthhHVn7gDRlVuFLq5kYQ= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=message-id:date:from:mime-version:to :subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type; s=smtpout; bh=G7ge D5LblesZNNODpIKwypMXakY=; b=J7LopwxVp588o5KtwS7noPcHjFo2A6J989Jw xz1Y+QhMvspDZLczfJEdD0PMLBH7DSOOZWAzQ3pSA+ekEI47bAK6PEEMfuu0aBof 21y2Q3XW4SKsa2JFwbDrGlztPK6MCEqWSxR10dYXqrBxPJBeVSRKfyAkNsJ+nE3C Dprhj60= X-Sasl-enc: BwAUOsSVYUaO7kDEBiRbbrcMVb2oXSxaEDGhUQElJiz1 1355517352 Received: from [192.168.5.18] (unknown [83.169.5.6]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id A3A2D8E0135 for ; Fri, 14 Dec 2012 15:35:52 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <50CB8DA2.9020108@binarywings.net> Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2012 21:35:46 +0100 From: Florian Philipp User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:10.0.11) Gecko/20121130 Thunderbird/10.0.11 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Question about new USE flags for xf86-video-intel References: <20121214174403.GB5651@waltdnes.org> In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 1.3.5 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enigA9A05CD5AAB057CFB738EBC2" X-Archives-Salt: d23b72b8-dab0-43fd-b48a-ffed994a6509 X-Archives-Hash: 90b410d62484ecb4c74add13669dbb05 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enigA9A05CD5AAB057CFB738EBC2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Am 14.12.2012 18:56, schrieb Mark Knecht: > On Fri, Dec 14, 2012 at 9:44 AM, Walter Dnes wr= ote: >> I'm updating a system that's probably gone 2 or 3 months since its >> last update. >> >> =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D >> !!! The ebuild selected to satisfy "x11-drivers/xf86-video-intel" has = unmet requirements. >> - x11-drivers/xf86-video-intel-2.20.13::gentoo USE=3D"dri -glamor -sna= -udev -uxa -xvmc" >> >> The following REQUIRED_USE flag constraints are unsatisfied: >> any-of ( glamor sna uxa ) >> =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D >> >> This is the first time I've run into these options. A bit of Google= >> detective work turned up some articles... >> >> http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=3Darticle&item=3Dintel_glamor_fi= rst&num=3D1 >> http://ickle.wordpress.com/2012/06/05/an-evening-with-glamor/ >> >> ...which give the impression that SNA is the fastest option overall. >> The phoronix article also mentioned some instability issues with glamo= r. >> I'll probably be going with SNA. Does anybody else have any experienc= e >> and/or opinions? >> >> -- >> Walter Dnes >> I don't run "desktop environments"; I run useful applications >> >=20 > I have no idea about performance but I've got udev and sna enabled at t= his time. >=20 +1 > gandalf ~ # emerge -pv xf86-video-intel >=20 > These are the packages that would be merged, in order: >=20 > Calculating dependencies... done! > [ebuild R ] x11-drivers/xf86-video-intel-2.20.13 USE=3D"dri sna > udev -glamor -uxa -xvmc" 0 kB >=20 > Total: 1 package (1 reinstall), Size of downloads: 0 kB > gandalf ~ # >=20 > Be forewarned, or please report back if you can, but in my case on the > two Intel machines I have (one local, one my 84 year old dad uses) X11 > stopped displaying anything after this update. As a quick fix I > removed the xorg.conf file completely to get a desktop back. This was > a couple of weeks ago. Removing xorg.conf worked on both machines and > I haven't gone back to figure out what happened and how to best > address it. >=20 If you don't miss features I say good riddance to xorg.conf. Regards, Florian Philipp --------------enigA9A05CD5AAB057CFB738EBC2 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAlDLjaYACgkQqs4uOUlOuU+SQACcDGwHgoPcgjIW7ZvCXEwUGKQm NvMAnA7eDucI8u5Rc5zOPTiNV6ZfnbuU =VTxR -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enigA9A05CD5AAB057CFB738EBC2--