From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7FD291381F3 for ; Fri, 7 Dec 2012 12:07:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 0BD4DE05F8; Fri, 7 Dec 2012 12:06:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-gh0-f181.google.com (mail-gh0-f181.google.com [209.85.160.181]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 69973E0508 for ; Fri, 7 Dec 2012 12:05:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-gh0-f181.google.com with SMTP id y8so52496ghb.40 for ; Fri, 07 Dec 2012 04:05:08 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:x-enigmail-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=aHXE8+ELevcjWJ4PkFJ+LTeMMTdkWJ6b8u2cLQBN6wI=; b=ogaxCm63GgcOwdojIAwFUvJlJvVqyUNqLEt+ynBMDytaX1al1VvKqci1+zqe1e6u7o vVFWMR8C69xmV/A7yfjNQt3FaVpaGcD9WOwbKa5Y4rXVfulaAXg//qBMFCBr3d4n2uhH oNhIEx2mXBJPMVudaut1+m/4TyBgf3R4ENXy9sldSpkELSyrkchtenFRSndGo2eT2LVl IU7/3aoCfiyHVKi5jgg6ugVMd7dirHGThzZ0mFNbZW5hmbjWTCwN64cF0Gfkz7w7LvwX TNIpkNnqAcSuev01XpQnnU9TTWf2XkJYqRJJ7POBADVfBWufwxnS2qB+qjX+//v/8RF5 DBdQ== Received: by 10.100.250.2 with SMTP id x2mr1990821anh.14.1354881908536; Fri, 07 Dec 2012 04:05:08 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.2.5] (adsl-98-95-108-247.jan.bellsouth.net. [98.95.108.247]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id s21sm13256473yhb.5.2012.12.07.04.05.05 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Fri, 07 Dec 2012 04:05:07 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <50C1DB70.5090706@gmail.com> Date: Fri, 07 Dec 2012 06:05:04 -0600 From: Dale User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/17.0 SeaMonkey/2.14.1 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] eix and bad colors. References: <50C1CC89.4080704@gmail.com> <1354878756.31373.5@numa-i> In-Reply-To: <1354878756.31373.5@numa-i> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.4.6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: ee00a519-7e17-4245-b1c5-3a0d31d85392 X-Archives-Hash: 32bf974f8b16d4f1806d712cb7ae5944 Helmut Jarausch wrote: > On 12/07/2012 12:01:29 PM, Dale wrote: >> Howdy, >> >> I was using eix a bit ago and I noticed the colors have changed. Since >> I like to have white text and a black background, this is not working to >> well for me. It seems some of the output is black text. Put black text >> on a black background and I have missing text, usually the very thing I >> am looking for. I have looked for a config somewhere in /etc but can't >> find where this is set. I found where other colors are set but not for >> eix. >> >> Anyone have a hint as to where this is set or is it hard coded into eix? > > There is a long thread on > https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=438076 > > I have switched to eix-99999999 which enables customization of the > colors. > > I like black text on a light yellow background. Here is my .eixrc > > # BOOLEAN > # This variable is only used for delayed substitution in > COLORSCHEME{,_ALT}. > # If true, the "dark" color schemes (for black background) are selected. > DARK="false" > > # STRING > # If TERM_ALT does not match, this chooses the corresponding color of > # color specifications (starting from 0). > COLORSCHEME="%{?DARK}0%{else}2%{}" > > # STRING > # If TERM_ALT matches, this chooses the corresponding color of > # color specifications (starting from 0). > COLORSCHEME_ALT="%{?DARK}1%{else}3%{}" > > > Helmut. > > > I'm going to give this a try. Man, I hope this works. This could make me bald. o_O Dale :-) :-) -- I am only responsible for what I said ... Not for what you understood or how you interpreted my words!