From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB8C01381F3 for ; Tue, 20 Nov 2012 21:46:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 7851421C07E; Tue, 20 Nov 2012 21:46:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-vb0-f53.google.com (mail-vb0-f53.google.com [209.85.212.53]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A47C821C06F for ; Tue, 20 Nov 2012 21:44:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-vb0-f53.google.com with SMTP id b23so1849232vbz.40 for ; Tue, 20 Nov 2012 13:44:37 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=NqPc/zutwQoTGv+eRLUV7vL2+DZn6/Z+BQE3cExM++k=; b=UZjRTzn4YjyHriOp5ddLgJ8h0Hm9uZPmXuQyO0s4nUCP5vwZqevn4rc/rlINuXqTA3 G4oN4Xd1h3JLfYTgISfDI8ixmFI8+DhkU0rZzi0qu1hr2TBdb/2iW0oEZpgY/M5rU2lJ 9p60BRLwBBBRwGlqqAuwtOPHgh7cF+693fSP7c2wjdHcaM/qadEy8KB5T980AuVZm1c7 +gC9E5t+Cj0gmMq40cNzdrgAI3LpZ3zjmVIXa+pOZUSAgaNLN9WVQuKNmHN4bOPo8I62 OSxKltpklFyMFhcLtiASFL6ZK0H1YYvhnnEoUGSFHVPqdwFymEvtrMn2Tv+wvPiZIaRF b1lw== Received: by 10.52.34.37 with SMTP id w5mr20415231vdi.86.1353447877704; Tue, 20 Nov 2012 13:44:37 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.1.10] (modemcable092.159-23-96.mc.videotron.ca. [96.23.159.92]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id dp6sm7369136vec.11.2012.11.20.13.44.35 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Tue, 20 Nov 2012 13:44:36 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <50ABFA2C.8080401@gmail.com> Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2012 16:46:20 -0500 From: Damien Levac User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:16.0) Gecko/20121028 Thunderbird/16.0.1 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Kernel 3.6: No external Monitor References: <50AB34C8.5010805@smash-net.org> <20121120125154.GD21245@server> <50AB8B39.3080609@smash-net.org> <50ABC5BB.7030708@binarywings.net> <50ABCCFC.6060900@smash-net.org> <50ABD548.9030501@gmail.com> <50ABE994.4000502@smash-net.org> In-Reply-To: <50ABE994.4000502@smash-net.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Archives-Salt: 0d934df2-b79e-4a5d-9f21-2875cb4b60ae X-Archives-Hash: 416c0b5a07edff93c51e0be2f81650d1 On 11/20/12 15:35, Norman Rieß wrote: > Am 20.11.2012 20:08, schrieb Damien Levac: >> On 11/20/12 13:33, Norman Rieß wrote: >>> Am 20.11.2012 19:02, schrieb Florian Philipp: >>>> Am 20.11.2012 14:52, schrieb Norman Rieß: >>>>> Am 20.11.2012 13:51, schrieb Bruce Hill: >>>>>> On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 08:44:08AM +0100, Norman Rieß wrote: >>>>>>> Hello, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> i am using a Thinkpad X301 with a DVI Monitor connected to the mini >>>>>>> displayport. >>>>>>> That worked perfectly for years, but with Kernel 3.6 (and 3.7rc) the DVI >>>>>>> Monitor stays black on boot and it is not visible in xrandr. As if it >>>>>>> wasn't connected at all. >>>>>>> Rebooting with 3.5 brings back the Display with full functionality. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> All i found about this was a Fedora bugreport stating the issue, but is >>>>>>> unanswered for a month now. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Does someone got an idea here or faced the same issue and solved it? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Regards, >>>>>>> Norman >>>>>> Can you give us a link to: >>>>>> >>>>>> (1) the Fedora bug report >>>>>> (2) your 3.5 kernel .config >>>>>> (3) your 3.6 (and 3.7rc) kernel .config(s) >>>>>> >>>>> Yes. >>>>> (1) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=869824 >>>>> >>>>> (2) http://smash-net.org/temp/config-3.5.4 >>>>> (3) http://smash-net.org/temp/config-3.6.6 >>>>> http://smash-net.org/temp/config-3.7.0-rc6 >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> What does `xrandr --current` say? (from x11-apps/xrandr) >>>> >>>> Regards, >>>> Florian Philipp >>>> >>> In what situation? 3.5 or 3.6 kernel? >>> >> In doubt, both. But I'm fairly sure he meant 3.6 since there are no >> problem to solve in 3.5. :P >> >> Damien >> > Yeah, i was kinda irritated by that question, as i allready said, that > xrandr does not show the display. > 3.5 activates the display during kernel loading, on 3.6 it stays shut > off during the whole boot process. > > > 3.6: > xrandr --current > Screen 0: minimum 320 x 200, current 1440 x 900, maximum 32767 x 32767 > LVDS1 connected 1440x900+0+0 (normal left inverted right x axis y axis) > 287mm x 180mm > 1440x900 60.0*+ 50.0 > 1024x768 60.0 > 800x600 60.3 56.2 > 640x480 59.9 > VGA1 disconnected (normal left inverted right x axis y axis) > HDMI1 disconnected (normal left inverted right x axis y axis) > DP1 disconnected (normal left inverted right x axis y axis) > DP2 disconnected (normal left inverted right x axis y axis) > > --------------------------------------------- > 3.5 both screens mirrored: > xrandr --current > Screen 0: minimum 320 x 200, current 1440 x 900, maximum 32767 x 32767 > LVDS1 connected 1440x900+0+0 (normal left inverted right x axis y axis) > 287mm x 180mm > 1440x900 60.0*+ 50.0 > 1024x768 60.0 > 800x600 60.3 56.2 > 640x480 59.9 > VGA1 disconnected (normal left inverted right x axis y axis) > HDMI1 connected 1440x900+0+0 (normal left inverted right x axis y axis) > 518mm x 324mm > 1920x1200 60.0 + > 1600x1200 60.0 > 1680x1050 59.9 > 1680x945 60.0 > 1400x1050 59.9 > 1600x900 60.0 > 1280x1024 60.0 > 1440x900 59.9* > 1280x960 60.0 > 1366x768 60.0 > 1360x768 60.0 > 1280x800 59.9 > 1280x768 60.0 > 1024x768 60.0 > 1024x576 60.0 > 800x600 60.3 56.2 > 848x480 60.0 > 640x480 60.0 > DP1 disconnected (normal left inverted right x axis y axis) > DP2 disconnected (normal left inverted right x axis y axis) > > --------------------------------------------- > 3.5 in my dualscreen setup: > xrandr --current > Screen 0: minimum 320 x 200, current 3360 x 1200, maximum 32767 x 32767 > LVDS1 connected 1440x900+1920+0 (normal left inverted right x axis y > axis) 287mm x 180mm > 1440x900 60.0*+ 50.0 > 1024x768 60.0 > 800x600 60.3 56.2 > 640x480 59.9 > VGA1 disconnected (normal left inverted right x axis y axis) > HDMI1 connected 1920x1200+0+0 (normal left inverted right x axis y axis) > 518mm x 324mm > 1920x1200 60.0*+ > 1600x1200 60.0 > 1680x1050 59.9 > 1680x945 60.0 > 1400x1050 59.9 > 1600x900 60.0 > 1280x1024 60.0 > 1440x900 59.9 > 1280x960 60.0 > 1366x768 60.0 > 1360x768 60.0 > 1280x800 59.9 > 1280x768 60.0 > 1024x768 60.0 > 1024x576 60.0 > 800x600 60.3 56.2 > 848x480 60.0 > 640x480 60.0 > DP1 disconnected (normal left inverted right x axis y axis) > DP2 disconnected (normal left inverted right x axis y axis) > I know this is not really what you want to hear about, but you should wait for the fix to solve itself. The reason I'm saying this is that Intel programmers are really working hard on their graphics drivers with Steam comming to Linux and this is probably just a bug in their drivers to which we have no power. I could also be wrong though but I learned to just back off and wait when a new kernel version breaks something. Damien