From: Dale <rdalek1967@gmail.com>
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Fwd: [gentoo-project] With regard to udev stabilization
Date: Fri, 16 Nov 2012 21:54:03 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <50A70A5B.5030903@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20121117033651.GA14197@waltdnes.org>
Walter Dnes wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 16, 2012 at 07:24:54PM -0500, Michael Mol wrote
>> On Fri, Nov 16, 2012 at 5:47 PM, Walter Dnes <waltdnes@waltdnes.org> wrote:
>>> On Mon, Nov 12, 2012 at 09:20:42PM -0600, Dale wrote
>>>> Well, it appears we have someone willing to fork udev. Yeppie !!
>>>> Me, I'm looking forward to seeing how this works and giving it a test
>>>> run when it gets ready. Since it is a fork, shouldn't be to long,
>>>> I hope.
>>> BTW, this has hit Slashdot...
>>> http://linux.slashdot.org/story/12/11/16/2052203/gentoo-developers-fork-udev
>> Be sure to read Richard Yao's response:
>> http://linux.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=3256499&cid=42006113
> I understand that he's still getting the effort organized. I am not a
> C programmer, but if the effort needs any beta testers, I'm willing to
> volunteer. BTW, it looks like Lennart Poettering is more unpopular than
> Steve Ballmer on Slashdot.
>
Thing I like about the fork, if people get fed up with udev, udev falls
flat on its face or something else causes udev to fail, we have a udev
already ready. That statement may not be true for another couple months
or so but at least there is a Gentoo plan B.
Also, I can get rid of dracut too. ;-)
Walter, I wonder how much your work helped this along? If you had not
stepped up and did what you have done, then this fork may have never
happened. You could have at least let others know there are people
looking for something else. If so, thanks for that. :-D
Dale
:-) :-)
--
I am only responsible for what I said ... Not for what you understood or how you interpreted my words!
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-11-17 3:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <50A1B335.2080907@gentoo.org>
2012-11-13 3:20 ` [gentoo-user] Fwd: [gentoo-project] With regard to udev stabilization Dale
2012-11-13 8:41 ` Michael Hampicke
2012-11-13 9:23 ` Dale
2012-11-13 11:47 ` Pandu Poluan
2012-11-13 14:42 ` Bruce Hill
2012-11-13 21:56 ` pk
2012-11-14 2:57 ` Walter Dnes
2012-11-14 3:44 ` Pandu Poluan
2012-11-14 4:45 ` Dale
2012-11-16 22:47 ` Walter Dnes
2012-11-17 0:24 ` Michael Mol
2012-11-17 3:36 ` Walter Dnes
2012-11-17 3:54 ` Dale [this message]
2012-11-17 4:02 ` Michael Mol
2012-11-17 3:54 ` Michael Mol
2012-11-17 5:12 ` Walter Dnes
2012-11-17 7:29 ` Dale
2012-11-17 9:16 ` Pandu Poluan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=50A70A5B.5030903@gmail.com \
--to=rdalek1967@gmail.com \
--cc=gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox