From: Dale <rdalek1967@gmail.com>
To: Gentoo User <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>
Subject: [gentoo-user] Fwd: [gentoo-project] With regard to udev stabilization
Date: Mon, 12 Nov 2012 21:20:42 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <50A1BC8A.2060607@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <50A1B335.2080907@gentoo.org>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1582 bytes --]
-------- Original Message --------
Subject: [gentoo-project] With regard to udev stabilization
Date: Mon, 12 Nov 2012 21:40:53 -0500
From: Richard Yao <ryao@gentoo.org>
Reply-To: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org
To: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org
Richard Yao wrote:
> Dear Everyone,
>
> It is no secret that many of us are unhappy with the direction that udev
> has taken under the leadership of the systemd developers. That includes
> Linus Torvalds, who is 'leery of the fact that the udev maintenance
> seems to have gone into some "crazy mode" where they have made changes
> that were known to be problematic, and are pure and utter stupidity.'
>
> https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/10/2/505
>
> After speaking with several other Gentoo developers that share Linus'
> concerns, I have decided to form a team to fork udev. Our plan is to
> eliminate the separate /usr requirement from our fork, among other
> things. We will announce the project later this week.
>
> I understand that the council is scheduled to vote on a topic related to
> udev stabilization. Would it be possible to delay the vote for another
> month so that we have time to get organized?
>
> Yours truly,
> Richard Yao
>
Well, it appears we have someone willing to fork udev. Yeppie !! Me, I'm looking forward to seeing how this works and giving it a test run when it gets ready. Since it is a fork, shouldn't be to long, I hope.
I wonder what they will name it tho.
Dale
:-) :-)
--
I am only responsible for what I said ... Not for what you understood or how you interpreted my words!
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 2849 bytes --]
next parent reply other threads:[~2012-11-13 3:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <50A1B335.2080907@gentoo.org>
2012-11-13 3:20 ` Dale [this message]
2012-11-13 8:41 ` [gentoo-user] Fwd: [gentoo-project] With regard to udev stabilization Michael Hampicke
2012-11-13 9:23 ` Dale
2012-11-13 11:47 ` Pandu Poluan
2012-11-13 14:42 ` Bruce Hill
2012-11-13 21:56 ` pk
2012-11-14 2:57 ` Walter Dnes
2012-11-14 3:44 ` Pandu Poluan
2012-11-14 4:45 ` Dale
2012-11-16 22:47 ` Walter Dnes
2012-11-17 0:24 ` Michael Mol
2012-11-17 3:36 ` Walter Dnes
2012-11-17 3:54 ` Dale
2012-11-17 4:02 ` Michael Mol
2012-11-17 3:54 ` Michael Mol
2012-11-17 5:12 ` Walter Dnes
2012-11-17 7:29 ` Dale
2012-11-17 9:16 ` Pandu Poluan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=50A1BC8A.2060607@gmail.com \
--to=rdalek1967@gmail.com \
--cc=gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox