public inbox for gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dale <rdalek1967@gmail.com>
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] [OT] (sort of) strange things after upgrading the kernel
Date: Fri, 12 Oct 2012 22:13:19 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5078DC4F.4080403@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAHH9eM6OoYFyBQa14gm5ToBciSCA=yMmUNtbzo0j3eiTjpt4TQ@mail.gmail.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3070 bytes --]

Francisco Ares wrote:
>
> 2012/10/12 Dale <rdalek1967@gmail.com <mailto:rdalek1967@gmail.com>>
>
>     Francisco Ares wrote:
>     >
>     >
>     > Thanks for your reply, Dale.
>     >
>     > Yes, everything works as expected when using the old kernel.
>     >
>     > I decided to re-emerge some base libraries, and nothing worked,
>     until
>     > I remembered to re-emerge udev. After the build, it announced two
>     > wrong lines in the new kernel "config" file:
>     >
>     > CONFIG_SYSFS_DEPRECATED=y
>     > CONFIG_SYSFS_DEPRECATED_V2=y
>     >
>     > After correcting them and building the kernel again, now
>     everything is
>     > back to normal.
>     >
>     > Thanks again
>     > Francisco
>     >
>     >
>     > --
>     > "If you have an apple and I have an apple and we exchange apples
>     then
>     > you and I will still each have one apple. But if you have an
>     idea and
>     > I have one idea and we exchange these ideas, then each of us
>     will have
>     > two ideas." - George Bernard Shaw
>
>
>     Do you use oldconfig or build each one from scratch?  I use
>     oldconfig so
>     that I at least have what I know works.  It's just a matter of if
>     I need
>     anything new enabled.  Some claim oldconfig shouldn't be used but
>     I have
>     only had it to fail once in the last 10 years or so.  Most everyone I
>     know of uses oldconfig.
>
>     Glad you got it going tho.
>
>     Dale
>
>     :-)  :-)
>
>     --
>     I am only responsible for what I said ... Not for what you
>     understood or how you interpreted my words!
>
>
>
>
> I normally also use oldconfig. I think there might be a reason for it
> to be around. But this time I didn't, because the old kernel was
> version 2.6.39 and I thought oldconfig would mess things up more than
> help on the new 3.4.9. Don't know how right or wrong is this
> assumption, though.
>
> I just was lazy to upgrade the kernel, as it takes an hour or so to
> check most of menucofig.
>
> Francisco
>

I would have tried it but that is a LOT of updates.  It may be faster to
start from scratch in that case.  I know a few years ago there was some
changes that kept oldconfig from working as it should.  That was the
only time it failed me but I do upgrade more often to avoid this sort of
thing.  I try to upgrade every couple months.  Now if I have long
uptimes, I may not actually ever use that kernel but I have a config
file to copy over that is a bit more up to date. 

I would suggest printing or something the output of the following: 
lspci -k  That tells you what you need for your hardware, that is of
course from a kernel where all your hardware works.  There may be some
specific things for certain software that is needed but at least you can
boot up and have a system to work with.  I usually leave the rest to
defaults unless I am sure there is something I don't need. 

Glad you got it sorted out and working tho. 

Dale

:-)  :-) 

-- 
I am only responsible for what I said ... Not for what you understood or how you interpreted my words!


[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 4745 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2012-10-13  3:14 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <CAHH9eM5+7aCQHe59tvhfSCzX6uAhCHP-7wjQ55YH_irxwoKvMg@mail.gmail.com>
2012-10-12 21:20 ` [gentoo-user] [OT] (sort of) strange things after upgrading the kernel Francisco Ares
2012-10-12 21:56   ` Dale
2012-10-13  1:50     ` Francisco Ares
2012-10-13  2:22       ` Dale
2012-10-13  2:42         ` Francisco Ares
2012-10-13  3:13           ` Dale [this message]
2012-10-14 13:36             ` Francisco Ares
2012-10-14 14:46               ` Dale
2012-10-14 21:54                 ` Peter Humphrey
2012-10-14 22:33                   ` Dale

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5078DC4F.4080403@gmail.com \
    --to=rdalek1967@gmail.com \
    --cc=gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox