From: Paige Thompson <erratic@devel.ws>
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: [gentoo-user] Gentoo Portage Feature Request
Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2009 09:16:32 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5061b39c0909210916u38206918j41e7917609cb2f76@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2089 bytes --]
I hope nobody finds this offensive, I'm not a great writer but I gotta get
this out there.
Goal: to resolve quality issues with packages and the behavior of portage
Problem 1:
This is a really simple thing, first of all it would help a lot if packages
will not try to build with specified cxxflags if the maintainer hasn't
tested the build and enabled them for that package.
case and point:
I have -fstack-protector-all in my cxxflags because I'm a paranoid idiot and
I'm overly confident that it could never be wrong to have that. emacs, fails
to build because of it but it's not obvious. I file a really pedantic bug
report, and later through trial and error and after having gotten over my
confidence in -fstack-protector-all realized that without it the package
*does* build. If the ebuild had a feature where it's metadata did not
indicate that it could build with that cxxflag, then portage could stop and
just tell me that up front *OR* prompt me and ask me what do next. I
understand that this would require package maintainers to actually *test*
their packages which is no trivial issue, and who wouldn't agree that if
they're not willing to then somebody else should? Not only that but it gives
you the ability to score maintainers based on the accuracy of the results.
I'm not even suggesting that this feature should be mandatory it could be
something that I could turn on or off-- I just want it so that I know what's
going on and I don't end up wasting people's time filing bug reports and
making them mad at me for being a noob.
Problem 2:
I know this is might be kind of nitpicky to you, and it's more or less the
same as problem 1 but I think if I specify -O0 in my cxxflags, that a
package that needs -O2 should not build and tell me that it needs it rather
than just building with -O2 anyway!! I mean seriously, why even give me the
option to specify the optimization level in the cxxflags. It's deceptive, I
don't like that I find it very difficult to take it seriously because of
that.
-Paige Thompson
erratic@devel.ws
saved on 9/21/09 8:41 AM by Paige Thompson
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 2291 bytes --]
next reply other threads:[~2009-09-21 16:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-09-21 16:16 Paige Thompson [this message]
2009-09-21 16:27 ` [gentoo-user] Gentoo Portage Feature Request Alan McKinnon
2009-09-21 16:46 ` Volker Armin Hemmann
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5061b39c0909210916u38206918j41e7917609cb2f76@mail.gmail.com \
--to=erratic@devel.ws \
--cc=gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox