* [gentoo-user] mod_qos x mod_security x mod_evasive
@ 2012-08-19 21:56 Alexandre Riveira
2012-08-20 17:26 ` Jarry
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Alexandre Riveira @ 2012-08-19 21:56 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-user
Hi,
What better module for prevent DOS Attack, mod_qos, mod_security or
mod_evasive
Tank's for all gentoo users.
Alexandre Riveira
Object Data
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-user] mod_qos x mod_security x mod_evasive
2012-08-19 21:56 [gentoo-user] mod_qos x mod_security x mod_evasive Alexandre Riveira
@ 2012-08-20 17:26 ` Jarry
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Jarry @ 2012-08-20 17:26 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-user
On 19-Aug-12 23:56, Alexandre Riveira wrote:
>
> What better module for prevent DOS Attack, mod_qos, mod_security or
> mod_evasive
mod_security seems to me to be the most mature, but might not
be easy to configure. But honestly, none of them can protect
you from DOS, if malicious traffic saturates your network
connection...
In some cases it is even easier to DOS a web-site with those
modules activated (when as a result of incomming traffic all
cpu-cycles are used for filtering, instead of serving web
pages to valid clients)...
Jarry
--
_______________________________________________________________
This mailbox accepts e-mails only from selected mailing-lists!
Everything else is considered to be spam and therefore deleted.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2012-08-20 17:29 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2012-08-19 21:56 [gentoo-user] mod_qos x mod_security x mod_evasive Alexandre Riveira
2012-08-20 17:26 ` Jarry
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox