[gentoo-user] Heliodor?

[gentoo-user] Heliodor?

[Dan Cowsill]

Hello list, first time postage here.

Right, so I installed Beryl a little while ago on Gnome, and for the
life of me I cannot either find the elusive Heliodor theming manager
to apply a new theme or figure out a way to apply Beryl-specific
themes using another tool.

So what's the deal here?  I use the newest nvidia drivers and I'm
running Gentoo on an amd64 system.

Thanks for any insights you can provide,
Dan

-- 
-·=»Ðŧħ«=·-

Re: [gentoo-user] Heliodor?

[Alan McKinnon]

On Wednesday 04 April 2007, Dan Cowsill wrote:
> Hello list, first time postage here.

Welcome !

> Right, so I installed Beryl a little while ago on Gnome, and for the
> life of me I cannot either find the elusive Heliodor theming manager
> to apply a new theme or figure out a way to apply Beryl-specific
> themes using another tool.
>
> So what's the deal here?  I use the newest nvidia drivers and I'm
> running Gentoo on an amd64 system.

The package is x11-wm/heliodor. If you can't find it then I assume you 
have installed a stable amd64 system?

All 3 available versions of heliodor are marked unstable on amd64, so 
for stable amd64 you'll have to:

echo 'x11-wm/heliodor' > /etc/portage/package.keywords
emerge -av heliodor

alan


-- 
Optimists say the glass is half full,
Pessimists say the glass is half empty,
Developers say wtf is the glass twice as big as it needs to be?

Alan McKinnon
alan at linuxholdings dot co dot za
+27 82, double three seven, one nine three five
-- 
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list

[gentoo-user] Re: Heliodor?

[Francesco Talamona]

> echo 'x11-wm/heliodor' > /etc/portage/package.keywords
> emerge -av heliodor

Do the following, instead :)
echo 'x11-wm/heliodor ~amd64' >> /etc/portage/package.keywords

Bye
	Francesco


-- 
Linux Version 2.6.20-gentoo-r4, Compiled #1 PREEMPT Sun Mar 25 09:20:13 
CEST 2007
One 1GHz AMD Athlon 64 Processor, 2GB RAM, 2004.03 Bogomips Total
aemaeth
-- 
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Heliodor?

[Neil Bothwick]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 434 bytes --]

On Wed, 4 Apr 2007 18:57:01 +0200, Francesco Talamona wrote:

> > echo 'x11-wm/heliodor' > /etc/portage/package.keywords
> > emerge -av heliodor  
> 
> Do the following, instead :)
> echo 'x11-wm/heliodor ~amd64' >> /etc/portage/package.keywords

Either will work. If no arch is given in package.keywords, it defaults to
~yourcurrentarch.


-- 
Neil Bothwick

Overcome by jealousy, Data dismembers the Energizer Bunny

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Heliodor?

[Ryan Sims]

On 4/4/07, Neil Bothwick <neil@digimed.co.uk> wrote:
> On Wed, 4 Apr 2007 18:57:01 +0200, Francesco Talamona wrote:
>
> > > echo 'x11-wm/heliodor' > /etc/portage/package.keywords
> > > emerge -av heliodor
> >
> > Do the following, instead :)
> > echo 'x11-wm/heliodor ~amd64' >> /etc/portage/package.keywords
>
> Either will work. If no arch is given in package.keywords, it defaults to
> ~yourcurrentarch.
>

Perhaps I'm being pedantic, but I think it's worth making clear that
Alan's version will clobber /etc/portage/package.keywords, excepting
noclobber-type options.

-- 
Ryan W Sims
-- 
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Heliodor?

[Neil Bothwick]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 744 bytes --]

Hello Ryan Sims,

> > > > echo 'x11-wm/heliodor' > /etc/portage/package.keywords
> > > > emerge -av heliodor  
> > >
> > > Do the following, instead :)
> > > echo 'x11-wm/heliodor ~amd64' >> /etc/portage/package.keywords  
> >
> > Either will work. If no arch is given in package.keywords, it
> > defaults to ~yourcurrentarch.

> Perhaps I'm being pedantic, but I think it's worth making clear that
> Alan's version will clobber /etc/portage/package.keywords, excepting
> noclobber-type options.

You're right. I was commenting on Alan's omission and Francesco's
inclusion of '~amd64'. I completely missed that Alan had used > instead
of >>.


-- 
Neil Bothwick

I just got lost in thought. It was unfamiliar territory.

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Heliodor?

[Alan McKinnon]

On Wednesday 04 April 2007, Ryan Sims wrote:
> On 4/4/07, Neil Bothwick <neil@digimed.co.uk> wrote:
> > On Wed, 4 Apr 2007 18:57:01 +0200, Francesco Talamona wrote:
> > > > echo 'x11-wm/heliodor' > /etc/portage/package.keywords
> > > > emerge -av heliodor
> > >
> > > Do the following, instead :)
> > > echo 'x11-wm/heliodor ~amd64' >> /etc/portage/package.keywords
> >
> > Either will work. If no arch is given in package.keywords, it
> > defaults to ~yourcurrentarch.
>
> Perhaps I'm being pedantic, but I think it's worth making clear that
> Alan's version will clobber /etc/portage/package.keywords, excepting
> noclobber-type options.

/me hangs head in shame after a blooper like that ....

Thanks for picking it up ;-)

alan



-- 
Optimists say the glass is half full,
Pessimists say the glass is half empty,
Developers say wtf is the glass twice as big as it needs to be?

Alan McKinnon
alan at linuxholdings dot co dot za
+27 82, double three seven, one nine three five
-- 
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Heliodor?

[Alan McKinnon]

On Wednesday 04 April 2007, Francesco Talamona wrote:
> > echo 'x11-wm/heliodor' > /etc/portage/package.keywords
> > emerge -av heliodor
>
> Do the following, instead :)
> echo 'x11-wm/heliodor ~amd64' >> /etc/portage/package.keywords

The ~amd64 is redundant in package.keywords if ACCEPT_KEYWORDS=amd64

man 5 portage -> section for package.keywords

alan


-- 
Optimists say the glass is half full,
Pessimists say the glass is half empty,
Developers say wtf is the glass twice as big as it needs to be?

Alan McKinnon
alan at linuxholdings dot co dot za
+27 82, double three seven, one nine three five
-- 
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list