From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Q2rmG-0006aT-Ld for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Thu, 24 Mar 2011 21:09:08 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 516B5E06F4; Thu, 24 Mar 2011 21:07:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-fx0-f53.google.com (mail-fx0-f53.google.com [209.85.161.53]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F1657E06F4 for ; Thu, 24 Mar 2011 21:07:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: by fxm11 with SMTP id 11so519298fxm.40 for ; Thu, 24 Mar 2011 14:07:31 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:message-id:from:to:subject:date:user-agent :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding :content-type; bh=S2kXt65QGKoIGTF5XOZWvsPcpX4Guf/68Sv30F21gU0=; b=MoYGhLxXBwalohEgYjny01bEj2adgWSvkAicddCjpEbUMJB9BLBlxbWmXA2Lx1KEeK LHLoaFx3J+v21CoWmyXj8GTO70+dzBqGlrHzNTfxdIagdvAgaiL8Ri+aypQW85EQBR9M nqt6F0tpaU6Tkv//fnn55BvM7Uw2P9eoSOwd4= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:from:to:subject:date:user-agent:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:content-type; b=R4cYFbcVeW8Wf2uWAuG64SYCa9h1j02lYaC4++mSzgouOYboJa/IoSGWtmWBGP9zOo 98aGo2r2jJkXy54iDb18PV2Z7NCHPiWCZUeA3QUx3775bstI1wkQOpLU2ATtBkP5K8s/ 56pLww0py0a+PURTSS4uDhnNgb9HTU+/Htnbk= Received: by 10.223.98.8 with SMTP id o8mr5268624fan.22.1301000851050; Thu, 24 Mar 2011 14:07:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: from energy.localnet (p4FC74AB5.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [79.199.74.181]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id l4sm141705fan.14.2011.03.24.14.07.29 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Thu, 24 Mar 2011 14:07:30 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4d8bb292.8461df0a.57dd.0ee1@mx.google.com> From: Volker Armin Hemmann To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] LVM (Was: the best filesystem for server: XFS or JFS (or?)) Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2011 22:07:28 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/4.6 beta4 (Linux/2.6.36.4r4; KDE/4.6.1; x86_64; ; ) In-Reply-To: <6382559.dddi5o1M78@nazgul> References: <4D87A7C6.1060502@gmail.com> <4D8B7D2B.90708@gmail.com> <6382559.dddi5o1M78@nazgul> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Archives-Salt: X-Archives-Hash: 7455a029cc8bf302effbf19c491f7285 On Thursday 24 March 2011 12:08:02 Alan McKinnon wrote: > On Thursday 24 March 2011 12:19:39 Dale wrote: > > I have never used LVM but when it messes up after a upgrade, as has > > happened to many others, see if you say the same thing. I hope your > > backups are good and they can restore. > > What is this "mess up after an upgrade" of which you speak? > > I've used multiple versions of LVM on multiple machines across multiple > distros for multiple years and never once heard of anyone having a problem > with it let along experienced one myself. > > Shades of FUD methinks. http://bugs.gentoo.org/buglist.cgi?quicksearch=lvm or if you like a bit of history: http://bugs.gentoo.org/buglist.cgi?quicksearch=ALL+lvm there you go. I like this one: http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=350455