From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org)
	by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <gentoo-user+bounces-120796-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>)
	id 1Q27f9-00039p-6k
	for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Tue, 22 Mar 2011 19:54:53 +0000
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 3F90C1C0DF;
	Tue, 22 Mar 2011 19:52:50 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-fx0-f53.google.com (mail-fx0-f53.google.com [209.85.161.53])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E16E91C0DF
	for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Tue, 22 Mar 2011 19:52:49 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by fxm11 with SMTP id 11so8993461fxm.40
        for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Tue, 22 Mar 2011 12:52:49 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=googlemail.com; s=gamma;
        h=domainkey-signature:message-id:from:to:subject:date:user-agent
         :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding
         :content-type;
        bh=LuBPDZcOONcHmXfl7YSBc6iQyqTJqD1TP3AOxFZVQPM=;
        b=o9dLj6iQ5OTnU8TGWgQ1V1QgcKA5cljnzP3TBmEZ6mpLrId3fhyH+p96qO0/Goj7RK
         dYZBqLjCTpadr68puGOoIBhCtzc5ZVREeX0FyhzL71ZbdvPywc0mP2mJhDsf0AfjuuUA
         6oIZYPKCduNt1Lx4EVS+PsAf+2Q0cs/aebDDc=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=googlemail.com; s=gamma;
        h=message-id:from:to:subject:date:user-agent:in-reply-to:references
         :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:content-type;
        b=FNxrvDNiDS7nX71TDEQrJbrydkTYv0RTkJQRBRG7FEhTMd1uCWKgCDyyYpgZU+Fkxq
         sV5E2GF4S/T1Nt4KucVhMw/PLWzapvjd/UcgCoQkJLNfzn7sB3IFUpErS5I4UcMA0KOt
         iVlnY23P/dt4RtPbmbGGV0Rssrml9boBgmZtc=
Received: by 10.223.160.5 with SMTP id l5mr2496960fax.85.1300823503864;
        Tue, 22 Mar 2011 12:51:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from energy.localnet (p4FC74A2D.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [79.199.74.45])
        by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id l4sm1556926fan.14.2011.03.22.12.51.40
        (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER);
        Tue, 22 Mar 2011 12:51:41 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <4d88fdcd.8461df0a.02e6.ffff9e7d@mx.google.com>
From: Volker Armin Hemmann <volkerarmin@googlemail.com>
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] the best filesystem for server: XFS or JFS (or?)
Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2011 20:51:37 +0100
User-Agent: KMail/4.6 beta4 (Linux/2.6.36.4r4; KDE/4.6.1; x86_64; ; )
In-Reply-To: <4D87A7C6.1060502@gmail.com>
References: <4D87A7C6.1060502@gmail.com>
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-user+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-user.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
X-Archives-Salt: 
X-Archives-Hash: 068fec9c19db4be3d5245bc6c9599870

On Monday 21 March 2011 20:32:22 Jarry wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> I'm looking for "the best" filesystem for a small multi-purpose
> server with a couple of services running (ftp, web, mail, mysql).
> For me very important features are:
> 
> snapshot (will be used for backup, must be native without lvm)
> journaling
> resizeable (if possible online)
> 
> After a little research I have found two candidates:
> JFS (created by IBM)

jfs = no barriers = not safe for your data.

Use something different.