From: Volker Armin Hemmann <volkerarmin@googlemail.com>
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Microcode update AMD
Date: Tue, 18 Jan 2011 18:48:20 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4d35d267.9232cc0a.1735.3ff0@mx.google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTi=99gr7WOFvLWBwDd-Nx6FVH0OS3++m64YD-DwB@mail.gmail.com>
On Tuesday 18 January 2011 09:34:14 Mark Knecht wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 8:16 AM, Mark Knecht <markknecht@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 7:38 AM, Paul Hartman
> >
> > <paul.hartman+gentoo@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> On Mon, Jan 17, 2011 at 10:29 PM, William Kenworthy <billk@iinet.net.au>
wrote:
> >>> The bios microcode update is likely an enable setting rather than
> >>> the
> >>> bios actually updating the cpu. You need to do some reading/asking
> >>> of
> >>> the manufacturers (not here) if it bothers you.
> >>
> >> Thanks for the links, I didn't realize they made the microcode data
> >> available separately.
> >>
> >> From Intel's download site for the microcode data:
> >>
> >> "The microcode data file contains the latest microcode definitions for
> >> all Intel processors. Intel releases microcode updates to correct
> >> processor behavior as documented in the respective processor
> >> specification updates. While the regular approach to getting this
> >> microcode update is via a BIOS upgrade, Intel realizes that this can
> >> be an administrative hassle. The Linux Operating System and VMware ESX
> >> products have a mechanism to update the microcode after booting. For
> >> example, this file will be used by the operating system mechanism if
> >> the file is placed in the /etc/firmware directory of the Linux
> >> system."
> >
> > Thanks for the info Paul.
> >
> > For kicks I tried it on an Intel DH55HC MB running an Core i5-661.
> >
> > 1) Created /etc/firmware
> > 2) Downloaded the Intel microcode-20101123.tgz file
> > 3) Enabled the /dev/cpu/microcode option under Processor Types and
> > Features 4) Rebuilt the kernel and rebooted
> >
> > I see this in dmesg:
> >
> > mark@firefly ~ $ dmesg | grep micro
> > [ 0.495337] microcode: CPU0 sig=0x20652, pf=0x2, revision=0x9
> > [ 0.495436] microcode: CPU1 sig=0x20652, pf=0x2, revision=0x9
> > [ 0.495535] microcode: CPU2 sig=0x20652, pf=0x2, revision=0x9
> > [ 0.495635] microcode: CPU3 sig=0x20652, pf=0x2, revision=0x9
> > [ 0.495751] microcode: Microcode Update Driver: v2.00
> > <tigran@aivazian.fsnet.co.uk>, Peter Oruba
> > mark@firefly ~ $
> >
> > On this machine the message doesn't change whether the microcode file
> > is located in /etc/firmware or not so I don't know how to tell if the
> > process worked but the processor doesn't need any updates or whether
> > it didn't work at all.
> >
> > - Mark
>
> OK, I got it to load by hand:
>
> 1) emerge microcode-ctl
>
> which also emerges microcode-data. Unfortunately microcode-data looks
> to be out of date. Add microcode_ctl to the boot level:
>
> rc-update add microcode_ctl boot
>
> 2) Unzip and untar the microcode file from Intel.
>
> 3) The above emerge placed the microcode.dat file in /lib/firmware,
> not /etc/firmware as suggested by the kernel, so I loaded the newer
> one from Intel by hand using microcode-ctl:
>
>
> firefly firmware # microcode_ctl -f /etc/firmware/microcode-20101123.dat
> microcode_ctl: writing microcode (length: 430080)
> microcode_ctl: microcode successfuly written to /dev/cpu/microcode
> firefly firmware # dmesg | grep micro
> [ 0.495755] microcode: CPU0 sig=0x20652, pf=0x2, revision=0x9
> [ 0.495853] microcode: CPU1 sig=0x20652, pf=0x2, revision=0x9
> [ 0.495952] microcode: CPU2 sig=0x20652, pf=0x2, revision=0x9
> [ 0.496050] microcode: CPU3 sig=0x20652, pf=0x2, revision=0x9
> [ 0.496168] microcode: Microcode Update Driver: v2.00
> <tigran@aivazian.fsnet.co.uk>, Peter Oruba
> [ 2647.731262] microcode: CPU0 updated to revision 0xc, date = 2010-06-10
> [ 2647.731982] microcode: CPU1 updated to revision 0xc, date = 2010-06-10
> [ 2647.732815] microcode: CPU2 updated to revision 0xc, date = 2010-06-10
> [ 2647.733608] microcode: CPU3 updated to revision 0xc, date = 2010-06-10
> firefly firmware #
>
> Now the microcode revision appears to be updated.
>
> I suspected that if I renamed the file in /etc/firmware to
> 'microcode.dat' maybe it would load automatically at boot time but it
> didn't so I moved it to lib/firmware where microcode_ctl does load it.
>
> NOTE: There is a /etc/conf.d/microcode_ctl config file but it doesn't
> see to include a path for microcode so I guess at this time I'm stuck
> overwriting the /lib/firmware directory until I learn more.
>
> Cheers,
> Mark
and that is all the intel stuff. For AMD all you have to do is:
modprobe -r microcode && modprobe microcode
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-01-18 18:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-01-17 17:21 [gentoo-user] Microcode update AMD meino.cramer
2011-01-17 18:10 ` BRM
2011-01-17 18:34 ` meino.cramer
2011-01-17 19:14 ` Volker Armin Hemmann
2011-01-17 18:48 ` Mark Knecht
2011-01-17 19:12 ` Volker Armin Hemmann
2011-01-20 0:53 ` [gentoo-user] " walt
2011-01-20 1:08 ` walt
2011-01-17 19:08 ` [gentoo-user] " Volker Armin Hemmann
2011-01-17 19:19 ` meino.cramer
2011-01-17 19:46 ` Volker Armin Hemmann
2011-01-17 19:57 ` meino.cramer
2011-01-17 20:12 ` Mark Knecht
2011-01-17 20:52 ` Volker Armin Hemmann
2011-01-18 4:29 ` William Kenworthy
2011-01-18 15:38 ` Paul Hartman
2011-01-18 16:16 ` Mark Knecht
2011-01-18 17:34 ` Mark Knecht
2011-01-18 17:48 ` Volker Armin Hemmann [this message]
2011-02-05 14:28 ` Enrico Weigelt
2011-02-05 15:26 ` meino.cramer
2011-02-05 17:07 ` Volker Armin Hemmann
2011-02-06 11:36 ` Volker Armin Hemmann
2011-01-18 17:55 ` Paul Hartman
2011-01-18 18:21 ` Mark Knecht
2011-01-18 20:42 ` Paul Hartman
2011-01-18 20:56 ` Mick
2011-01-18 21:13 ` Paul Hartman
2011-01-18 23:08 ` Mick
2011-01-18 23:56 ` Mark Knecht
2011-01-17 20:13 ` Jason Weisberger
2011-01-17 20:49 ` Volker Armin Hemmann
2011-01-17 21:59 ` Jason Weisberger
2011-01-17 23:27 ` Volker Armin Hemmann
2011-01-18 15:39 ` [gentoo-user] " Nuno J. Silva
2011-02-05 13:34 ` [gentoo-user] " Enrico Weigelt
2011-02-05 16:15 ` Florian Philipp
2011-01-18 16:27 ` Volker Armin Hemmann
2011-01-19 17:10 ` Volker Armin Hemmann
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4d35d267.9232cc0a.1735.3ff0@mx.google.com \
--to=volkerarmin@googlemail.com \
--cc=gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox