From: Dale <rdalek1967@gmail.com>
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Proper permissions for /var/log/portage/elog/summary.log?
Date: Sun, 24 Jun 2012 17:48:33 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4FE79941.7010700@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <201206242311.59825.michaelkintzios@gmail.com>
Mick wrote:
> On Sunday 24 Jun 2012 19:27:36 Dale wrote:
>> Jarry wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>> I have just checked my machines and I found I have basically
>>> two groups of settings ("ls -al" in /var/log/portage/elog/):
>>>
>>> A)
>>> drwxrws--- 2 portage root 4096 Jun 24 03:10 .
>>> drwxr-xr-x 3 root root 4096 Apr 7 2009 ..
>>> -rw-rw-r-- 1 portage root 57760 Jun 22 15:11 summary.log
>>>
>>> B)
>>> drwxrwsr-x 2 portage portage 4096 Jun 24 13:30 .
>>> drwxrws--- 3 portage portage 4096 Nov 3 2011 ..
>>> -rw-rw-r-- 1 portage portage 1132 Jun 22 17:28 summary.log
>>>
>>> Not only "summary.log", but also /var/log/portage/ and
>>> /var/log/portage/elog/ have quite different permissions.
>>> I'm sure I never changed it manually, the only difference
>>> is that "A" group has been installed 3 yers ago, while "B"
>>> just recently (but both regulary updated).
>>>
>>> So is the "B-version" correct one?
>>>
>>> Jarry
>> This is my thinking on why it may be different for different folks.
>> This first tho. I run emerge as root. I have not added my regular user
>> to the portage group. I have no memory of messing with the permissions
>> either.
>>
>> I think that if you use a regular user to emerge some things, it gets
>> set to portage:portage or some mix of portage:root. If you always run
>> emerge as root, then you get root:root. It may be that this is only set
>> once or that it could be modified if you run as root then later on run
>> as a user.
>>
>> For the record, mine is set to root:root. As mentioned above, I ALWAYS
>> run emerge as root.
>>
>> Any one have thoughts on this?
>>
>> Dale
>>
>> :-) :-)
> I always run emerge as root.
>
> elog is owned by portage:root, summary.log within it as portage:root, other
> log files within /var/log/portage are owned by portage:portage.
So those that allow users to run would have the same permissions as
everyone else. Now I wonder why they vary from system to system then.
It seems to me, they should be the same for everyone. Just seems odd.
Dale
:-) :-)
--
I am only responsible for what I said ... Not for what you understood or how you interpreted my words!
Miss the compile output? Hint:
EMERGE_DEFAULT_OPTS="--quiet-build=n"
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-06-24 22:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-06-24 14:12 [gentoo-user] Proper permissions for /var/log/portage/elog/summary.log? Jarry
2012-06-24 15:19 ` Mick
2012-06-24 17:46 ` Bryan Gardiner
2012-06-24 18:27 ` Dale
2012-06-24 22:11 ` Mick
2012-06-24 22:48 ` Dale [this message]
2012-06-25 0:27 ` Bryan Gardiner
2012-06-25 3:26 ` Dale
2012-06-26 18:43 ` Tanstaafl
2012-06-25 18:19 ` Jarry
2012-06-25 22:20 ` Michael Mol
2012-06-26 6:56 ` Bryan Gardiner
2012-06-26 7:03 ` Bryan Gardiner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4FE79941.7010700@gmail.com \
--to=rdalek1967@gmail.com \
--cc=gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox