From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from <gentoo-user+bounces-138782-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>) id 1SZnnz-000778-Db for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Wed, 30 May 2012 18:39:35 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 53317E0676; Wed, 30 May 2012 18:39:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: from out3-smtp.messagingengine.com (out3-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.27]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CBD9DE084B for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Wed, 30 May 2012 18:37:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: from compute3.internal (compute3.nyi.mail.srv.osa [10.202.2.43]) by gateway1.nyi.mail.srv.osa (Postfix) with ESMTP id 896F3212F6 for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Wed, 30 May 2012 14:37:52 -0400 (EDT) Received: from frontend1.nyi.mail.srv.osa ([10.202.2.160]) by compute3.internal (MEProxy); Wed, 30 May 2012 14:37:52 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=binarywings.net; h=message-id:date:from:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type; s=mesmtp; bh=3z4SFb+zHHwN86w/k6o8Isc5 bBQ=; b=m80RvbUEcHYrrPvrEWV/Qsf0KCQNIEsM2dDbLxtVqcgzF/ri4ISJ4vPY qnfwEt3L4wgAt1eL/8p2zWozOzHYnpb3HhuSqIdJyftnRIiPbXcmrRPrgMmMU5Ur 3rNTvm/mEecnkCXeepWGrf9QJAevnZO0CSvtPIOs4WSUCj/ctGk= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=message-id:date:from:mime-version:to :subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type; s=smtpout; bh=3z4S Fb+zHHwN86w/k6o8Isc5bBQ=; b=JnWLrwdIWvhB3BEy764ps2a9eCnljHb71R93 hQ2PkHIP6LR+lzRjHjtwTxsScIwNiLJeSHq5mxZaC0mcRCFR4urXF8AzdLZEJ5/j 5kv3H0a6iv5AhENX65CqU8SDU31ulRgN5y9m5nYQ7Nio7NyruCK8Aqeloa3RpXZP Pf+8G5E= X-Sasl-enc: SWLVLtQHbiBQQyhEXZ/cA08J+ePRMMu4Mf/tOw7vaoHJ 1338403071 Received: from [192.168.5.18] (unknown [83.169.5.6]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 73B168E012F for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Wed, 30 May 2012 14:37:51 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <4FC668F9.7080304@binarywings.net> Date: Wed, 30 May 2012 20:37:45 +0200 From: Florian Philipp <lists@binarywings.net> User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:10.0.4) Gecko/20120505 Thunderbird/10.0.4 Precedence: bulk List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org> List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-user+help@lists.gentoo.org> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org> List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org> List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-user.gentoo.org> X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] revdep-rebuild (gawk) issues References: <j6uYa-sw-27@gated-at.bofh.it> <alpine.LNX.2.00.1205291901010.16243@wma7002.mathematik.uni-wuerzburg.de> <CANRt_=a+a-+JPiD=6jBRuX3jmV0hoCbTWzp+q4B08ugSGOGb1g@mail.gmail.com> <20120529230937.13e48154@khamul.example.com> <CANRt_=aON81uian-Ap2KA0b6PN8Ebk5=oaufPx88M+=qphsxYw@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <CANRt_=aON81uian-Ap2KA0b6PN8Ebk5=oaufPx88M+=qphsxYw@mail.gmail.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.3.5 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enig6842DB93F1AE868E4917C051" X-Archives-Salt: 7d5886d9-968a-47dd-a439-cd8f5ac4e0a9 X-Archives-Hash: 56c7754f36071e3665fc0cedf79ee7ed This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig6842DB93F1AE868E4917C051 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Am 29.05.2012 23:37, schrieb Rafa Griman: > On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 11:09 PM, Alan McKinnon <alan.mckinnon@gmail.co= m> wrote: >> On Tue, 29 May 2012 22:56:07 +0200 >> Rafa Griman <rafagriman@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> Hi Vaeth :) >>> >>> On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 7:02 PM, Vaeth >>> <vaeth@mathematik.uni-wuerzburg.de> wrote: >>>> On Tue, 29 May 2012, Rafa Griman wrote: >>>>> >>>>> gawk: cmd. line:3: error: Unmatched [ or [^: /[^[:space:]]/ >>>> >>>> >>>> Your gawk is broken. This happens if you emerged gawk with >>>> current gcc and aggressive FLAGS like -DNDEBUG or -flto. >>>> Not sure whether it is a bug of gawk or gcc. >>> >>> >>> So it seems to be the CFLAGS :( As I said in my previous e-mail, I wa= s >>> "experimenting" a bit with them ... I'll be more conservative ;) >> >> Well, on the one hand the flags don;t seem to be too bad overall, but >> on the other hand there's the golden rule of Gentoo: >> >> Don't stuff around with CFLAGS >> >> Why not? Well, there's the ricer phenomenon where changed CFLAGS >> worsen performance and stability but the user's own bias convinces >> him/her that it's actually vastly improved. >=20 >=20 > I know that rule and tried not to be too agressive but seems I was O:) > Since it's not my min machine, I was going to experiment (nothing > "scientific", just curiosity) trying different options on different > partitions and see how they work out. >=20 Out of curiosity: What flags do you run now? Do you know which flag exactly caused the problem? They didn't seem too experimental though -fno-inline looked odd. Regards, Florian Philipp --------------enig6842DB93F1AE868E4917C051 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAk/GaPkACgkQqs4uOUlOuU9mggCfdhhF4gqSlXZy7g5iBkHuvf7Y MwsAnilEQSjpxsrR4tg+75o72LSTxZ2v =tC5M -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig6842DB93F1AE868E4917C051--