Re: [gentoo-user] revdep-rebuild (gawk) issues

[Florian Philipp <lists@binarywings.net>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1627 bytes --]

Am 29.05.2012 23:37, schrieb Rafa Griman:
> On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 11:09 PM, Alan McKinnon <alan.mckinnon@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Tue, 29 May 2012 22:56:07 +0200
>> Rafa Griman <rafagriman@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Vaeth :)
>>>
>>> On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 7:02 PM, Vaeth
>>> <vaeth@mathematik.uni-wuerzburg.de> wrote:
>>>> On Tue, 29 May 2012, Rafa Griman wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> gawk: cmd. line:3: error: Unmatched [ or [^: /[^[:space:]]/
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Your gawk is broken. This happens if you emerged gawk with
>>>> current gcc and aggressive FLAGS like -DNDEBUG or -flto.
>>>> Not sure whether it is a bug of gawk or gcc.
>>>
>>>
>>> So it seems to be the CFLAGS :( As I said in my previous e-mail, I was
>>> "experimenting" a bit with them ... I'll be more conservative ;)
>>
>> Well, on the one hand the flags don;t seem to be too bad overall, but
>> on the other hand there's the golden rule of Gentoo:
>>
>> Don't stuff around with CFLAGS
>>
>> Why not? Well, there's the ricer phenomenon where changed CFLAGS
>> worsen performance and stability but the user's own bias convinces
>> him/her that it's actually vastly improved.
> 
> 
> I know that rule and tried not to be too agressive but seems I was O:)
> Since it's not my min machine, I was going to experiment (nothing
> "scientific", just curiosity) trying different options on different
> partitions and see how they work out.
> 

Out of curiosity: What flags do you run now? Do you know which flag
exactly caused the problem? They didn't seem too experimental though
-fno-inline looked odd.

Regards,
Florian Philipp


[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 262 bytes --]