From: Florian Philipp <lists@binarywings.net>
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] {OT} hire a programmer or company?
Date: Sat, 26 May 2012 13:44:23 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4FC0C217.6050302@binarywings.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAN0CFw2e2BWFtm72qk1T1DAiA=5s_hYH9K2MYc0tuT_aFCipQw@mail.gmail.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1540 bytes --]
Am 26.05.2012 13:26, schrieb Grant:
> I'm debating whether I should hire an expert programmer for $X/hour,
> or a company of expert programmers for $2X/hour. It makes sense from
> a financial perspective to hire programmers directly, but I wonder if
> there are benefits to hiring a really good company.
>
> I'm sorry this is OT, but I bet you guys have some seriously good
> insight on this.
>
> Thanks,
> Grant
>
For starters, you could give us a bit more insight into the kind of
project we are talking about. What's the expected development effort,
what are the services you pay for (binaries, source code, testing,
maintenance, ...)?
Regarding programmer vs. company, I'd say it depends on what you expect
and pay for. If you just want it coded, then the lone programmer is
probably as good as the company (since programming itself doesn't really
scale well with the number of devs).
Extensive testing, on the other hand, is something a team should do.
Sure, the lone programmer can write you some unit tests and conduct a
system test, but testing itself is a profession of its own and should be
done by a second person with the relevant training.
But in the end, these issues a minor. It really boils down to whom you
trust more. Ask for references, look at their previous work, talk to
them, etc.
All things being equal, paying 1*x instead of 2*x gives you the chance
to pay another 1*x to a second developer if things don't work out with
the first one. ;-)
Regards,
Florian Philipp
[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 262 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-05-26 11:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-05-26 11:26 [gentoo-user] {OT} hire a programmer or company? Grant
2012-05-26 11:44 ` Florian Philipp [this message]
2012-05-27 6:22 ` Grant
2012-05-27 8:27 ` Alan McKinnon
2012-05-27 8:51 ` Florian Philipp
2012-05-27 16:09 ` Grant
2012-05-27 16:35 ` Volker Armin Hemmann
2012-05-27 16:53 ` Grant
2012-05-27 21:18 ` Alan McKinnon
2012-05-28 15:30 ` Michael Orlitzky
2012-05-27 21:18 ` Alan McKinnon
2012-05-28 16:00 ` Grant
2012-05-28 20:50 ` Alan McKinnon
2012-05-29 8:34 ` Grant
2012-05-29 12:08 ` Alan McKinnon
2012-05-29 17:51 ` Grant
2012-05-29 20:10 ` Alan McKinnon
2012-05-30 9:00 ` Grant
2012-05-29 12:30 ` Pandu Poluan
2012-05-29 13:58 ` Michael Mol
2012-05-29 14:05 ` Michael Orlitzky
2012-05-29 14:37 ` Alan McKinnon
2012-05-29 23:52 ` Peter Humphrey
2012-05-30 9:11 ` Grant
2012-05-30 12:57 ` [gentoo-user] " Nicolas Sebrecht
2012-05-30 22:58 ` [gentoo-user] " Alan McKinnon
2012-05-31 6:44 ` Grant
2012-05-29 17:02 ` [gentoo-user] " James
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4FC0C217.6050302@binarywings.net \
--to=lists@binarywings.net \
--cc=gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox