From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1SWWRb-0004pT-Fu for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Mon, 21 May 2012 17:30:56 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 176D4E0698; Mon, 21 May 2012 17:30:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vergina.dyndns.org (cust-218-222.on4.ontelecoms.gr [92.118.218.222]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D1BC5E0C46 for ; Mon, 21 May 2012 17:28:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.0.1] (viper.vergina.dyndns.org [192.168.0.1]) by viper.vergina.dyndns.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6B91134D4 for ; Mon, 21 May 2012 20:28:10 +0300 (EEST) Message-ID: <4FBA7B2A.8090200@asyr.hopto.org> Date: Mon, 21 May 2012 20:28:10 +0300 From: Thanasis User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:10.0.4) Gecko/20120513 Thunderbird/10.0.4 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: [gentoo-user] ebuild log suggests to remove old libraries Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: f765666a-b9f3-4de5-94bd-beab6a09f069 X-Archives-Hash: 1f16917e438461c857f4975eff2acf2a After a recent update of dev-libs/libffi from version 3.0.10 to 3.0.11 the ebuild log suggests to run: # revdep-rebuild --library '/usr/lib64/libffi.so.5' and once finished running revdep-rebuild, it should be safe to delete the old libraries, like so: # rm '/usr/lib64/libffi.so.5' However by querying: equery b /usr/lib/libffi.so.5 * Searching for /usr/lib/libffi.so.5 ... dev-libs/libffi-3.0.11 (/usr/lib64/libffi.so.5) we see that /usr/lib64/libffi.so.5 is reported as belonging to dev-libs/libffi-3.0.11. Is that normal?