From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1ST0zE-0007k6-JN for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sat, 12 May 2012 01:19:08 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 413F8E0824; Sat, 12 May 2012 01:18:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-yx0-f181.google.com (mail-yx0-f181.google.com [209.85.213.181]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C26D1E081B for ; Sat, 12 May 2012 01:17:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: by yenl3 with SMTP id l3so3598635yen.40 for ; Fri, 11 May 2012 18:17:07 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:x-enigmail-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=HFemmzxX7hmZtu6JXaiO6lkfO4TQeFY8UKf1E0qNNtE=; b=OnBidUbZ1vNAsimvrLcCZiZiatBlHx7AwdKPe4y/lsOLE83Du1V25/F2JxuA3emNVD 9+xoz6nfPAbmQwlPhB2G7zszsFr4zGe8JAUWTtUQYJ7Y6iZzy92D2+LivVpmwqQYZpuu GMYmzcTmwVCMq2KX0c7vA4TsxNZTsTUuFxJS0zfAPiRr2sYNNfbPG507rN5tuwKHbRWX qgQD7GHgLcN2NM2Ke94DKdtKnT4aICyyhbO42piUdWGG5vQORPYEGFDZ7SSVIL1KE1nN hO0Af5OgzXYpREBfdyG8pd1Z9RaVtBOTNSKvHwT97RHN2CNRB96Mm3zKqntl0IhIPzMc uFSQ== Received: by 10.236.72.133 with SMTP id t5mr167165yhd.94.1336785427293; Fri, 11 May 2012 18:17:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.2.5] (adsl-98-95-147-220.jan.bellsouth.net. [98.95.147.220]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id l13sm17681694ann.2.2012.05.11.18.17.05 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Fri, 11 May 2012 18:17:06 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4FADBA10.9030903@gmail.com> Date: Fri, 11 May 2012 20:17:04 -0500 From: Dale User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:12.0) Gecko/20120510 Firefox/12.0 SeaMonkey/2.9.1 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] What to use for Flash? References: <4FABAAE7.8000509@gmail.com> <201205110808.06274.michaelkintzios@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <201205110808.06274.michaelkintzios@gmail.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.4.1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: 549032b9-7b0b-4960-afef-4896e74db083 X-Archives-Hash: 1c270aed5370ed6a04da3aad772eefd4 Mick wrote: > The latest stable www-plugins/adobe-flash-11.2.202.235 includes the sse2check > flag and warnings about it - I take it that you have taken hid of these? > > $ euse -i sse2check > global use flags (searching: sse2check) > ************************************************************ > no matching entries found > > local use flags (searching: sse2check) > ************************************************************ > [- ] sse2check > www-plugins/adobe-flash: This flag, enabled by default, will check > for sse2 support on your cpu and die if not found. If you are > remote-building this package, you can disable this flag but you have > been warned > 10.3.183.18 [gentoo] > [+ B] 11.2.202.228 [gentoo] > [+ B] 11.2.202.233 [gentoo] > [+ B] 11.2.202.235 [gentoo] I checked on this when it was mentioned, I guess in the other thread. It appears it got changed when I did my upgrade. At least it doesn't crash now. It was enabled tho so I fixed that. New problem tho. I have Seamonkey's web browser on desktop 1. The email is on desktop 2. My local radar from NOAA uses flash. When I load it, I can see the image from flash on both desktop 1 and 2. Everything else is updated except the flash part. If I switch a couple times, it gets really weird looking. Looks like someone slipped LSD in my drink or something. Just weird colors and such. What's up with that? I'm going to try rebuilding a couple things to make sure everything is in sync. Maybe that will fix it. While I am at it. Is HTML5 going to replace flash? I don't mean in the next week but over a period of time. While researching this, I ran across posts that suggest HTML5 will render flash outdated. Just curious. Dale :-) :-) -- I am only responsible for what I said ... Not for what you understood or how you interpreted my words! Miss the compile output? Hint: EMERGE_DEFAULT_OPTS="--quiet-build=n"