From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org)
	by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <gentoo-user+bounces-136859-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>)
	id 1SCews-0000nZ-UE
	for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Tue, 27 Mar 2012 22:33:07 +0000
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E17A9E06D6;
	Tue, 27 Mar 2012 22:32:47 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-gx0-f181.google.com (mail-gx0-f181.google.com [209.85.161.181])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 16759E0A62
	for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Tue, 27 Mar 2012 22:31:09 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by ggni4 with SMTP id i4so415716ggn.40
        for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Tue, 27 Mar 2012 15:31:09 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
        h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references
         :in-reply-to:x-enigmail-version:content-type
         :content-transfer-encoding;
        bh=o3lbRATMAmGd+kwgvLz/ttoI8rzEIGiM13BdG5tzo8o=;
        b=zWxx3F/2BrlstazO2u2gj7ylrJ/uUzW3vS+wli7tfKaPL4hsxYHkDnnroixp02uLaJ
         4kvaGw4Ps4uKHUmF9qsunX/aTZvLsasG9H81x8oG/iCCLwCSsNj1dlU9SWdnc2pZPr0q
         ZAg4B4PfbOW/CKRKkNJG8lPIenTAmreV8GPP5PjrcVTpbi/1kDHQVuMMVJmnGIApYA5W
         icAWEYoeglT4NXhbJNgoZfK+Tj9BwnDxboCqyyo/8fkqbk/mIzPJNp09SVoEBSrBHuTX
         6DKmkYF/jyYb4yNT+CVQAsYlIEK3KX6Y4EVjV00DufckoK1PBa9gX4HI0nHSSw9iwak2
         W9Kw==
Received: by 10.236.155.101 with SMTP id i65mr28217326yhk.52.1332887469592;
        Tue, 27 Mar 2012 15:31:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.2.5] (adsl-98-95-214-242.jan.bellsouth.net. [98.95.214.242])
        by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id m30sm2828618yhe.15.2012.03.27.15.31.07
        (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER);
        Tue, 27 Mar 2012 15:31:08 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <4F723FAA.9090205@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2012 17:31:06 -0500
From: Dale <rdalek1967@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:11.0) Gecko/20120325 Firefox/11.0 SeaMonkey/2.8
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-user+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-user.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] InitRAMFS - boot expert sought
References: <1332844604.4130.0@numa-i> <4F71BE44.3080206@kutulu.org> <CA+czFiB=9Z_ny4Q8Ro_pkKJJnJEjOc3eZRO4e5-=JHHJzf1imQ@mail.gmail.com> <4F71E865.30800@hadt.biz> <4F71F182.5010709@gmail.com> <CAK2H+eeUYU85XBNQLOsu+ana90JUqgwQ0cHYcev4pK3ZvCkFxA@mail.gmail.com> <4F7224B8.1050806@gmail.com> <CAK2H+ec7U4aGD+CviR46xuN6ujt78R0O=DCBLL9f_9LpoG0=0w@mail.gmail.com> <4F723842.4000501@gmail.com> <20120328001421.7c65a401@khamul.example.com>
In-Reply-To: <20120328001421.7c65a401@khamul.example.com>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.4
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Archives-Salt: 0fc7f933-7ae4-4cd9-b664-437eba1321db
X-Archives-Hash: 3c51f5b4b33bbc2fd3c9e25f67d351cd

Alan McKinnon wrote:
> On Tue, 27 Mar 2012 16:59:30 -0500
> Dale <rdalek1967@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
>> Mark Knecht wrote:
>>> On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 1:36 PM, Dale <rdalek1967@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> <SNIP>
>>>  Right now, my plan is to mask udev at what it is and either
>>>> switch to another distro
>>> <SNIP>
>>>
>>> Just remember, with distros it's the device you know for the devil
>>> you don't know...
>>>
>>> I don't understand why any of this /usr /udev stuff is bothering
>>> you. Do you really use a separate /usr? Aren't you on stable like
>>> me or are you on ~amd64?
>>>
>>> Good luck. I'm positive you'll come to your senses about this Ubuntu
>>> nonsense! ;-)))
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>> Mark
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> My plan was to put / on ext4, /boot on ext2 and everything else on
>> LVM. That would incluse /usr, /usr/portage, /var and /home.  I have
>> not done that yet because doing it would force me to make a choice
>> very soon since this mess is coming pretty soon.
> 
> That's easy to fix. It takes a while and it's mind-numbingly boring,
> but it's easy.
> 
> All you need is a decent amount of free disk space as you will shuffle
> things around just like in that 15 pieces game.
> 
> Assuming / is the first (or second) partition on a disk:
> 
> Measure how much data is on the file system.
> Measure how much data is on the /usr file system.
> Move partitions after / on the disk out of the way creating enough free
> space to contain current / and /usr.
> Enlarge / partition, enlarge the file system on it, copy contents
> of /usr there.
> Arrange the rest of your disk the way you want it (either with or
> without LVM, both are easy enough to do).
> Move the rest of your data back to it's final destination.
> Delete any last remnants of the old /usr partition.
> 
> And all your worries about initramfs will go away. Trust me (no, not
> because I sell used cars, but because I do this for a living and have
> done it several times)
> 


Right now, I doubt my current / partition can hold all the /usr stuff.
It would require a complete undoing then redoing, like you just laid
out.  I have done this before but I would like to only have to do it
once and be done.  That is why I want to use LVM for everything but /
but if I could get this to work right, I wouldn't mind having / on LVM
too.

Right now, I have very little confidence in this init thingy and me
getting it to work much less able to fix it even it doesn't boot for
some reason.

< sighs >

Dale

:-)  :-)


-- 
I am only responsible for what I said ... Not for what you understood or
how you interpreted my words!

Miss the compile output?  Hint:
EMERGE_DEFAULT_OPTS="--quiet-build=n"