From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1S1Ich-0000uV-JP for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sat, 25 Feb 2012 14:29:19 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 45083E0BCA; Sat, 25 Feb 2012 14:29:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-yx0-f181.google.com (mail-yx0-f181.google.com [209.85.213.181]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E140EE0B6C for ; Sat, 25 Feb 2012 14:28:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: by yenm1 with SMTP id m1so1807379yen.40 for ; Sat, 25 Feb 2012 06:28:03 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of rdalek1967@gmail.com designates 10.236.145.193 as permitted sender) client-ip=10.236.145.193; Authentication-Results: mr.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of rdalek1967@gmail.com designates 10.236.145.193 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=rdalek1967@gmail.com; dkim=pass header.i=rdalek1967@gmail.com Received: from mr.google.com ([10.236.145.193]) by 10.236.145.193 with SMTP id p41mr11513881yhj.124.1330180083436 (num_hops = 1); Sat, 25 Feb 2012 06:28:03 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:x-enigmail-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=AyBEP9rBciTKqwV7hpigNgSCzqOur0nqIV6+Uf73GZI=; b=HCe9w/VkH4ZO8DEbX3+6Q+THRU5GuySVS/h9eZMWWDUbFGvwejr2kldTV6z88ScXa2 wiQ81RJdsIzr5Y5N6j2JWdiFN0q5He2t5drralSGMdsWyrOR+bIFNChBHc5wJf6DcRhd 4Z1kWXiVDsm/i+3uRYCip4Dqn3FLNdqG/zTfo= Received: by 10.236.145.193 with SMTP id p41mr8660644yhj.124.1330180083352; Sat, 25 Feb 2012 06:28:03 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.2.5] (adsl-65-0-116-97.jan.bellsouth.net. [65.0.116.97]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id l2sm13359287anq.12.2012.02.25.06.28.01 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Sat, 25 Feb 2012 06:28:02 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <4F48EFF0.5080806@gmail.com> Date: Sat, 25 Feb 2012 08:28:00 -0600 From: Dale User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:10.0.1) Gecko/20120218 Firefox/10.0.1 SeaMonkey/2.7.1 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Firefox-10.0.1 fails to compile on x86 References: <20120222002227.GA3081@ca.inter.net> <20120223102240.GB6656@Gee-Mi-Ni.epfl.ch> <201202231044.51216.michaelkintzios@gmail.com> <4F469D8D.5000809@gmail.com> <4F46DB1B.8050403@gmail.com> <20120225062244.GA7047@waltdnes.org> <4F48C96E.10507@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 1.3.5 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: ce5f38fb-8545-46be-b37b-0876335cda41 X-Archives-Hash: 43eace2a0370c92c84f5d910a9440e99 Nikos Chantziaras wrote: > On 25/02/12 13:43, Dale wrote: >> Walter Dnes wrote: >>> In that case, the benchmarks are useless. From my personal >>> experience... a fresh i686 install on a 4 and 1/2 year old Dell with >>> onboard Intel GPU was not able to keep up with the slowest available >>> speed on NHL Gamecenter Live. Ditto for 1080i TV from my HDHomerun >>> tuner box. After rebuilding system+world+kernel with "march=native", >>> it works just fine for the above tasks. I'm not the only one to see >>> this. See thread... >> >> It's odd that I was thinking about your video problem when I posted my >> reply earlier. >> >> If using those makes no difference, why even have the option? > > I was talking about Firefox though, which was what this thread is about :-P > > > But one could read that as for all software. Dale :-) :-) -- I am only responsible for what I said ... Not for what you understood or how you interpreted my words! Miss the compile output? Hint: EMERGE_DEFAULT_OPTS="--quiet-build=n"