Re: [gentoo-user] libreoffice-bin-3.4.5.2 broken ?

[Dale <rdalek1967@gmail.com>]

Jacques Montier wrote:
> Le 18/02/2012 14:51, Dale a écrit :
>> Jacques Montier wrote:
>>> Le 18/02/2012 13:54, Neil Bothwick a écrit :
>>>> On Sat, 18 Feb 2012 10:39:32 +0100, Jacques Montier wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> I upgraded to libreoffice-bin-3.4.5.2 which is stable in portage, but it
>>>>> does'nt work on intel ie7 amd64.
>>>>> I get "instruction not permitted".
>>>>> So i masked 3.4.5.2 and downgraded to 3.3.4.
>>>> It seems like it was compiled using CFLAGS unsuitable for an i7.
>>>>
>>>> Why not use the source package? What's the point of having an i7 if you
>>>> can't brag about compiling LO in well under an hour? ;-)
>>>>
>>>>
>>> Before ie7, i had an 10 year-old PC, and it was 5 or 6 hours compiling
>>> Openoffice...
>>> Let's try now...;-)
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>>
>>> --
>>> Jacques
>>>
>> Chew on this one.  This is for my old rig:
>>
>>      Thu Dec 22 06:27:17 2011 >>> app-office/libreoffice-3.4.3.2-r1
>>        merge time: 18 hours, 46 minutes and 20 seconds.
>>
>> I just love updating that old thing.  lol
>>
>> Dale
>>
>> :-)  :-)
>>
>>
> Yes,
> 
> It was worth changing a use flag then  :-)
> 
> --
> Jacques
> 

Funny thing is, I updated that a week or so ago.  It took 3 tries to get
LOo to compile and finish.  Is it just me or do they always seem to fail
right at the end?  ROLF

Dale

:-)  :-)


-- 
I am only responsible for what I said ... Not for what you understood or
how you interpreted my words!

Miss the compile output?  Hint:
EMERGE_DEFAULT_OPTS="--quiet-build=n"