public inbox for gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jacques Montier <jmontier@gmail.com>
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] libreoffice-bin-3.4.5.2 broken ?
Date: Sat, 18 Feb 2012 15:05:50 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4F3FB03E.3020204@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4F3FACF8.7040303@gmail.com>

Le 18/02/2012 14:51, Dale a écrit :
> Jacques Montier wrote:
>> Le 18/02/2012 13:54, Neil Bothwick a écrit :
>>> On Sat, 18 Feb 2012 10:39:32 +0100, Jacques Montier wrote:
>>>
>>>> I upgraded to libreoffice-bin-3.4.5.2 which is stable in portage, but it
>>>> does'nt work on intel ie7 amd64.
>>>> I get "instruction not permitted".
>>>> So i masked 3.4.5.2 and downgraded to 3.3.4.
>>> It seems like it was compiled using CFLAGS unsuitable for an i7.
>>>
>>> Why not use the source package? What's the point of having an i7 if you
>>> can't brag about compiling LO in well under an hour? ;-)
>>>
>>>
>> Before ie7, i had an 10 year-old PC, and it was 5 or 6 hours compiling
>> Openoffice...
>> Let's try now...;-)
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Cheers,
>>
>> --
>> Jacques
>>
> Chew on this one.  This is for my old rig:
>
>      Thu Dec 22 06:27:17 2011 >>> app-office/libreoffice-3.4.3.2-r1
>        merge time: 18 hours, 46 minutes and 20 seconds.
>
> I just love updating that old thing.  lol
>
> Dale
>
> :-)  :-)
>
>
Yes,

It was worth changing a use flag then  :-)

--
Jacques





  reply	other threads:[~2012-02-18 14:07 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-02-18  9:39 [gentoo-user] libreoffice-bin-3.4.5.2 broken ? Jacques Montier
2012-02-18 12:41 ` Nilesh Govindrajan
2012-02-18 12:54 ` Neil Bothwick
2012-02-18 13:01   ` Nilesh Govindrajan
2012-02-18 16:53     ` Neil Bothwick
2012-02-18 13:43   ` Jacques Montier
2012-02-18 13:51     ` Dale
2012-02-18 14:05       ` Jacques Montier [this message]
2012-02-18 14:21         ` Dale
2012-02-18 14:42   ` Alan McKinnon
2012-02-18 15:17     ` Jacques Montier
2012-02-18 16:57     ` Neil Bothwick
2012-02-18 19:57       ` Alan McKinnon
2012-02-19 10:58       ` Thanasis
2012-02-19 11:45         ` Neil Bothwick
2012-02-19 12:26           ` Mick
2012-02-19 12:52             ` Neil Bothwick
2012-02-19 12:57             ` Meik Frischke
2012-02-19 14:36               ` Mick
2012-02-19 14:40                 ` Alecks Gates
2012-02-19 12:50         ` [gentoo-user] " Hartmut Figge
2012-02-19 12:54           ` Alan McKinnon
2012-02-19 13:05           ` Hartmut Figge
2012-02-19 15:21             ` Hartmut Figge
2012-02-20 14:55       ` [gentoo-user] " Stefan G. Weichinger

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4F3FB03E.3020204@gmail.com \
    --to=jmontier@gmail.com \
    --cc=gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox