From: Dale <rdalek1967@gmail.com>
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] libreoffice-bin-3.4.5.2 broken ?
Date: Sat, 18 Feb 2012 07:51:52 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4F3FACF8.7040303@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4F3FAB1C.4060601@gmail.com>
Jacques Montier wrote:
> Le 18/02/2012 13:54, Neil Bothwick a écrit :
>> On Sat, 18 Feb 2012 10:39:32 +0100, Jacques Montier wrote:
>>
>>> I upgraded to libreoffice-bin-3.4.5.2 which is stable in portage, but it
>>> does'nt work on intel ie7 amd64.
>>> I get "instruction not permitted".
>>> So i masked 3.4.5.2 and downgraded to 3.3.4.
>> It seems like it was compiled using CFLAGS unsuitable for an i7.
>>
>> Why not use the source package? What's the point of having an i7 if you
>> can't brag about compiling LO in well under an hour? ;-)
>>
>>
>
> Before ie7, i had an 10 year-old PC, and it was 5 or 6 hours compiling
> Openoffice...
> Let's try now...;-)
>
> Thanks,
>
> Cheers,
>
> --
> Jacques
>
Chew on this one. This is for my old rig:
Thu Dec 22 06:27:17 2011 >>> app-office/libreoffice-3.4.3.2-r1
merge time: 18 hours, 46 minutes and 20 seconds.
I just love updating that old thing. lol
Dale
:-) :-)
--
I am only responsible for what I said ... Not for what you understood or
how you interpreted my words!
Miss the compile output? Hint:
EMERGE_DEFAULT_OPTS="--quiet-build=n"
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-02-18 13:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-02-18 9:39 [gentoo-user] libreoffice-bin-3.4.5.2 broken ? Jacques Montier
2012-02-18 12:41 ` Nilesh Govindrajan
2012-02-18 12:54 ` Neil Bothwick
2012-02-18 13:01 ` Nilesh Govindrajan
2012-02-18 16:53 ` Neil Bothwick
2012-02-18 13:43 ` Jacques Montier
2012-02-18 13:51 ` Dale [this message]
2012-02-18 14:05 ` Jacques Montier
2012-02-18 14:21 ` Dale
2012-02-18 14:42 ` Alan McKinnon
2012-02-18 15:17 ` Jacques Montier
2012-02-18 16:57 ` Neil Bothwick
2012-02-18 19:57 ` Alan McKinnon
2012-02-19 10:58 ` Thanasis
2012-02-19 11:45 ` Neil Bothwick
2012-02-19 12:26 ` Mick
2012-02-19 12:52 ` Neil Bothwick
2012-02-19 12:57 ` Meik Frischke
2012-02-19 14:36 ` Mick
2012-02-19 14:40 ` Alecks Gates
2012-02-19 12:50 ` [gentoo-user] " Hartmut Figge
2012-02-19 12:54 ` Alan McKinnon
2012-02-19 13:05 ` Hartmut Figge
2012-02-19 15:21 ` Hartmut Figge
2012-02-20 14:55 ` [gentoo-user] " Stefan G. Weichinger
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4F3FACF8.7040303@gmail.com \
--to=rdalek1967@gmail.com \
--cc=gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox